BUFFALOTONE Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 I am not sure if was injured but he was a damn good LB in his day and would not be a bad pickup if he is still healthy. I know the new regime likes theguys they have but it doesnt hurt to have another vet presence on the field. We all know tko is coming back to full strength but it wouldnt hurt to add some vet depth. What do you guys think?
EC-Bills Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 I am not sure if was injured but he was a damn good LB in his day and would not be a bad pickup if he is still healthy. I know the new regime likes theguys they have but it doesnt hurt to have another vet presence on the field. We all know tko is coming back to full strength but it wouldnt hurt to add some vet depth. What do you guys think? 759122[/snapback] I would pass. Chad's getting too old has trouble staying healthy.
CoachChuckDickerson Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 I....have....heard....of.....him
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 No and no. Chad Brown is old and far to slow. As much as I liked Cowart back in the day he's also far to slow for this defense
Frez Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 To old...................time for the young guns to play FAST football.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 Chad Brown was washed-up LAST year. This year he's even more washed-up and hurt.
In space no one can hear Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 Chad Brown...cover 2 Defense?? No way...... and while I'm at it no Jason Gildon either!!!
Lori Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 I am not sure if was injured but he was a damn good LB in his day and would not be a bad pickup if he is still healthy. I know the new regime likes theguys they have but it doesnt hurt to have another vet presence on the field. We all know tko is coming back to full strength but it wouldnt hurt to add some vet depth. What do you guys think? 759122[/snapback] "In his day" was a long time ago; he's got a total of one sack in the past two seasons. The Pats are paper-thin at LB, but still saw no reason to keep Brown around. Not a good sign.
jarthur31 Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 10 years ago he would've been a fine pickup.
ganesh Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 Chad Brown...cover 2 Defense?? No way...... and while I'm at it no Jason Gildon either!!! 759266[/snapback] We no more have that Steeler Mafia that kept signing all the steeler rejects....thank god for that.....We couldn't get even one of those to play any decent ball for us.
Recommended Posts