Toledo Bill Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Today's Rochester article quotes Jauron as saying that defensive tackle Anderson will likely retain his starting position based on senority. I understand there is a place for this, but how about playing the best producers, regardless where they stand on senority? I really like Jauron so far but I don't agree with this thought process.
SACKMARINO Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Today's Rochester article quotes Jauron as saying that defensive tackle Anderson will likely retain his starting position based on senority. I understand there is a place for this, but how about playing the best producers, regardless where they stand on senority? I really like Jauron so far but I don't agree with this thought process. 757075[/snapback] i think senority to jauron means experience. i just wonder when anthony thomas is going to be named starting running back.
34-78-83 Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Today's Rochester article quotes Jauron as saying that defensive tackle Anderson will likely retain his starting position based on senority. I understand there is a place for this, but how about playing the best producers, regardless where they stand on senority? I really like Jauron so far but I don't agree with this thought process. 757075[/snapback] Anderson played quite well in the last game. I think DJ was just talking about the lineup for this upcoming game against DET, but I'm not sure if the D&C made that clear.
ricojes Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Today's Rochester article quotes Jauron as saying that defensive tackle Anderson will likely retain his starting position based on senority. I understand there is a place for this, but how about playing the best producers, regardless where they stand on senority? I really like Jauron so far but I don't agree with this thought process. 757075[/snapback] if that's his thought process for pre-season, i have no issues with that. As long as it doesn't carry into the regular season.
Dibs Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 if that's his thought process for pre-season, i have no issues with that. As long as it doesn't carry into the regular season. 757084[/snapback] But what if KW & TA are performing at the same level at the moment?
Toledo Bill Posted August 31, 2006 Author Posted August 31, 2006 if that's his thought process for pre-season, i have no issues with that. As long as it doesn't carry into the regular season. 757084[/snapback] Agreed... hopefully that is the case and I misinterpreted his statement.
ricojes Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Anderson played quite well in the last game. I think DJ was just talking about the lineup for this upcoming game against DET, but I'm not sure if the D&C made that clear. 757083[/snapback] It's pretty clear that he was referring to tonight's game... http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/p.../608310335/tbd/
JStranger76 Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 They're both gonna play about the same anyways, so it doesn't really matter. Personally, somewhere down the line I'd like to add a bigger body for short yardage situations at the very least at DT.
Toledo Bill Posted August 31, 2006 Author Posted August 31, 2006 But what if KW & TA are performing at the same level at the moment? 757088[/snapback] In that case, his statement would make perfect sense.
Kelly the Dog Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 I am liking Jauron more and more and more. When guys are close, he seems to move them in and out of the starting line-up very often. This keeps them fighting for the starting job as hard as they can. Gives them experience with the starting unit, and the coaches able to see them play with the starting unit. But he does it only in select positions. Notice he's not trying to do it with the offensive line because it needs the cohesion of playing together, even though Preston and Villarial are pretty close.
5 Wide Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 They're both gonna play about the same anyways, so it doesn't really matter. Personally, somewhere down the line I'd like to add a bigger body for short yardage situations at the very least at DT. 757092[/snapback] Agree.....It has been stated that the top 4 tackles are all going to be getting alot of PT in this system anyway, so having Tripplett, McCargo, Anderson, and Williams all moving in and out of the lineup to stay fresh is an interesting rotation
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Seems to me that Williams has more sack potential than Anderson, so it also seems to me that the idea is that you'd use Anderson on the early/run downs and Williams on the later/pass downs.
eSJayDee Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 And I thought "Senority" was how Spanish the guy was.
Lurker Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 Today's Rochester article quotes Jauron as saying that defensive tackle Anderson will likely retain his starting position based on senority. I understand there is a place for this, but how about playing the best producers, regardless where they stand on senority? I really like Jauron so far but I don't agree with this thought process. 757075[/snapback] Patience. DJ's a players coach and IMO, this move's a show of support for the vets. By week four, we'll see who's in the lineup...
Recommended Posts