MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 yeah, right! I love to hear my starting QB (3rd year now) has a great deep arm but can't hold onto the ball or make good decisions. Trust me. That is not a "good" half of football for him at least! What wasn't the good decision? Holding onto the ball too long? Already covered that. And I'd rather my 3rd year guy have a strong arm and make bad decisions than my 11 year vet have a weak arm and make bad decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJPearl2 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Does Holcomb have the ability to throw farther than 3 yards on 3rd and long? What happened to this guy? He was a gunslinger in Cle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDRupp Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Yep, that'll come with more playing time. He's making big throws, and that's awesome....once he develops more of a pocket awareness he'll be fine. I'm glad that they're giving him the whole first half, and I'm glad that Justin Smith was in there just as long. 746728[/snapback] He better develop it fast or I doubt he will be a Bill next year if he does this 3-5 times this year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sds7973 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Nope, you read that wrong. I hope that Nall and Kelly get reps because I still think the starting QB is very wide open still. Craig needs the most work. I want to see what he can do in this offense. Although, Nall has played in a west coast offense, Kelly would be suited for it because of his girly arm strength. Hehe Besides he makes very good short, quick, accurate reads. 746760[/snapback] Way 2 Go Kelly 3 and OUT!! My vote is for J Pee and see how the year goes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Time to put Nall in there. I've seen enough of Holcomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Time to put Nall in there. I've seen enough of Holcomb. 746766[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDRupp Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 What wasn't the good decision? Holding onto the ball too long? Already covered that. And I'd rather my 3rd year guy have a strong arm and make bad decisions than my 11 year vet have a weak arm and make bad decisions. 746762[/snapback] Oh. I agree totally. I want Losman to play at least the first 10 games unless injured no matter what. If he is doing okay let him finish it out, if not Nall gets a shot. Then, we know if we need a QB in 2007 offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 746767[/snapback] good thing there's no competition at punter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Oh. I agree totally. I want Losman to play at least the first 10 games unless injured no matter what. If he is doing okay let him finish it out, if not Nall gets a shot. Then, we know if we need a QB in 2007 offseason. 746768[/snapback] That sounds like a sound plan to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Oh. I agree totally. I want Losman to play at least the first 10 games unless injured no matter what. If he is doing okay let him finish it out, if not Nall gets a shot. Then, we know if we need a QB in 2007 offseason. Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sds7973 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Ditto. 746771[/snapback] I agree too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shagmago Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Time to put Nall in there. I've seen enough of Holcomb. 746766[/snapback] NOW, YOUR TALKIN!....He should of started tonight..he`s probably going to be rusty, but still better then them other two nutsacks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generaLee83 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 NOW, YOUR TALKIN!....He should of started tonight..he`s probably going to be rusty, but still better then them other two nutsacks! 746776[/snapback] I done love yer grammar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sds7973 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 NOW, YOUR TALKIN!....He should of started tonight..he`s probably going to be rusty, but still better then them other two nutsacks! 746776[/snapback] Been to the first week of training camp, and Nall was no different than the other two nutsacks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 NOW, YOUR TALKIN!....He should of started tonight..he`s probably going to be rusty, but still better then them other two nutsacks! 746776[/snapback] Gee, settle down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 As for JP's 2 sacks and fumbles which led to 6 points, last year he was sacked 26 times and fumbled only once. I doubt it's something to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Looks like Kyle Williams is the 'real deal', no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 A.Davis returning kicks now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Time to put Nall in there. I've seen enough of Holcomb. 746766[/snapback] One series and one pass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Looks like Kyle Williams is the 'real deal', no? 746782[/snapback] Seems to be one of the few names to be mentioned doing anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts