UConn James Posted August 14, 2006 Posted August 14, 2006 From a NH team playing in a LLWS regional.... Cam Cundy. This kid is so going to hate high school. ;) (For those of you just returning from Happy Hour, switch the vowels).
Lurker Posted August 14, 2006 Posted August 14, 2006 Sounds like he'll be a babe magnet to me....um, um good.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 Lets remember that NOBODY has it worse than this poor guy...High School must have been a hoot for him. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=148900
zevo Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 Lets remember that NOBODY has it worse than this poor guy...High School must have been a hoot for him. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=148900 743350[/snapback] that is f'n hysterical!
Lurker Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 Lets remember that NOBODY has it worse than this poor guy...High School must have been a hoot for him. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=148900 743350[/snapback] He must be one tough MF...
meazza Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 Lets remember that NOBODY has it worse than this poor guy...High School must have been a hoot for him. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=148900 743350[/snapback] LMAO
ExiledInIllinois Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 Seems the story about the game is more interesting... Think somebody brought it up in the other thread... Not to hijack... the thread... With regards to the game... Couldn't VT just have batted the bottom half of the sixth, even though they wouldn't have normally needed to because with "last ups" they had the lead. What I am saying is... Can a "winning" team in baseball still continue to bat the last half of the last inning, even know they don't need to and had mathematically "won" the game? Is it mandatory they not play the last half of the last inning? So... If it isn't mandatory that your TEAM NOT play their "last ups"... Why did VT start tinkering with the game in the top half of the sixth?... They should have just finished NH (or let NH purposely get out... Thinking they (NH) could appeal and win) off and then demanded to finish the bottom of the sixth just to get the "forgotten"/left out player to bat. Or was it really a lose-lose situation for the VT team?... Seems if the VT coach really "forgot" about one player, they were screwed no matter what... Unless they were allowed to go into the bottom of the sixth winning... Get my drift???
dib Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 Lets remember that NOBODY has it worse than this poor guy...High School must have been a hoot for him. I wonder if he shaves or decided to grow a beard?
stuckincincy Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 An old SNL skit had Kevin Nealon going through life with the name of "Johnny Hildo" or some such, chronically mistaken for "Dildo". He ended up in prison after fnally murdering someone (headline: "Crazed Dildo Murders!), and his cellmate introduced himself as "I'm Ralph...Ralph Bagina".
buckeyemike Posted August 15, 2006 Posted August 15, 2006 I wonder if he shaves or decided to grow a beard? 743582[/snapback] Oh, good Lord. That's evil. Mike
UConn James Posted August 16, 2006 Author Posted August 16, 2006 Seems the story about the game is more interesting... Think somebody brought it up in the other thread... Not to hijack... the thread... With regards to the game... Couldn't VT just have batted the bottom half of the sixth, even though they wouldn't have normally needed to because with "last ups" they had the lead. What I am saying is... Can a "winning" team in baseball still continue to bat the last half of the last inning, even know they don't need to and had mathematically "won" the game? Is it mandatory they not play the last half of the last inning? So... If it isn't mandatory that your TEAM NOT play their "last ups"... Why did VT start tinkering with the game in the top half of the sixth?... They should have just finished NH (or let NH purposely get out... Thinking they (NH) could appeal and win) off and then demanded to finish the bottom of the sixth just to get the "forgotten"/left out player to bat. Or was it really a lose-lose situation for the VT team?... Seems if the VT coach really "forgot" about one player, they were screwed no matter what... Unless they were allowed to go into the bottom of the sixth winning... Get my drift??? 743577[/snapback] I scanned through maybe half the story, and what I took from it was, VT was tanking it, trying to get NH to score a run to make it 9-9. That way, VT could put the kid up to bat in the bottom of the inning and be legit. The NH coach saw what was happening. I don't know about the 'last ups' rules. I guess it isn't/can't be played when that team already has the lead. Probably the same reason why tennis matches don't go to a 5th set tie-break after someone mathematically wins the championship 6-1 in the set. It's redundant..
Recommended Posts