Chef Jim Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Altoona. 729528[/snapback] Albacore or Yellowtail?
erynthered Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Albacore or Yellowtail? 729531[/snapback] Yellowtail, its a better wine. Australian, I believe. Damn, I'm thirsty, 20 more minutes....................
taterhill Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Which is a better city/area? 729524[/snapback] for?
Chef Jim Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 for? 729535[/snapback] Fish it seems. Or was it wine?
Cugalabanza Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Utica. Mmmmmwaahhh! (makes Italian-chef kiss-your-fingers-gesture, sarcastically indicating great magnificence)
drnykterstein Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 neither. your car insurance rates will be lower in roch, but in buffalo you will be closer to the bills games... .. choices.
PromoTheRobot Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Rochester pros: many beautiful neighborhoods, lots of recreational lake frontage, more corporate presence, more people of means. cost of living only slightly higher than Buffalo. Rochester cons: "smugtown" reputation, lacking in nightlife, poor sports town, terrible political represntation, can't get folks off their coaches with a stick of dynamite. Buffalo pros: People know how to party, rollicking nightlife, great sports town, anything but smug, easy-going lifestyle. Lower cost of living than Rochester. Politicians get millions in state aid for arenas etc. Buffalo cons: Local government committed to patronage...choking what little economic opportunity exists, While some nice neighborhods, most of the city is a slum, almost no recreational waterfront, the economy. PTR
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Rochester pros: many beautiful neighborhoods, lots of recreational lake frontage, more corporate presence, more people of means. cost of living only slightly higher than Buffalo. Rochester cons: "smugtown" reputation, lacking in nightlife, poor sports town, terrible political represntation, can't get folks off their coaches with a stick of dynamite. Buffalo pros: People know how to party, rollicking nightlife, great sports town, anything but smug, easy-going lifestyle. Lower cost of living than Rochester. Politicians get millions in state aid for arenas etc. Buffalo cons: Local government committed to patronage...choking what little economic opportunity exists, While some nice neighborhods, most of the city is a slum, almost no recreational waterfront, the economy. PTR 729586[/snapback] Another Rochester pro: easy drive to Buffalo to enjoy most of it's pros.
Pete Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Buffalo without a doubt. I would move back in a sec for a great job offer
Phlegm Alley Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Having lived in Rochester for a year and a half, I would say Buffalo for three reason: The Bills and everything that comes with the home games, bars are open until 4am, and the casinos along with Canada. Rochester is depressing--Kodak is a microcosm of what Rochester really is and I am so glad that I got away from the area all together.
kegtapr Posted July 26, 2006 Posted July 26, 2006 Rochester is depressing--Kodak is a microcosm of what Rochester really is and I am so glad that I got away from the area all together. 729616[/snapback] Yeah, well at least we've had power for the last week.
sweetbaboo Posted July 27, 2006 Posted July 27, 2006 Yeah, well at least we've had power for the last week. 729619[/snapback] that's because there weren't enough people in rochester that could afford air conditioning to cause blackouts
Helmet_hair Posted July 27, 2006 Posted July 27, 2006 Aquatic Resorts & Entertainment, wants to build its resort on 86 acres of land on Route 332 in Farmington, just south of the New York State Thruway. The resort would include a 70,000 square foot indoor waterpark, 175 room theme hotel, 100 room franchise hotel, conference rooms, restaurants, and a fitness center. A few years down the road, developers also envision residents at the site. Phase two includes residential units, street-scape stores and restaurants, similar to a small community. Pick Rochester, Cause they would not be putting up a resort like this in a dead city like Buffalo
scribo Posted July 27, 2006 Posted July 27, 2006 Pick Rochester, Cause they would not be putting up a resort like this in a dead city like Buffalo 729828[/snapback] Sorry, I am from Rochester and I do pick Rochester as my answer to this post, but there is no way Farmington, Victor and Canandaigua can support something that big. The problem with Exit 44 is that there is little else around it. OK, Eastview Mall is one exit away, but I am pretty sure that is sucking in every penny there is to be spent in the area. The developer looking to do this must have never heard of Roseland Park.
Recommended Posts