Rico Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 Are we really that bad!? 715150[/snapback] Look at the bright side:at least QB will be rated higher than the OL or DL.
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted June 28, 2006 Author Posted June 28, 2006 Look at the bright side:at least QB will be rated higher than the OL or DL. 715164[/snapback] If our QBs play PRETTY well.
Rico Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 I predict ESPN rates the DL 30th (Schobel saves us from the bottom) and the OL 32nd. LBs and DBs will have a much better grade.
Ramius Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 I predict ESPN rates the DL 30th (Schobel saves us from the bottom)and the OL 32nd. LBs and DBs will have a much better grade. 715166[/snapback] Nah, its ESPN and the hip thing to do this offseason is bash marv and ralph and the Bills. Our LB's will be rated 25th, and our DB'd about the same.
slothrop Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 Are we really that bad!? 715150[/snapback] 29th! Wow, are we really that good!? That means there are teams worse than us!
UConn James Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 Nah, its ESPN and the hip thing to do this offseason is bash marv and ralph and the Bills. Our LB's will be rated 25th, and our DB'd about the same. 715269[/snapback] Yup. According to the omniscient oracle that is ESPN, the Bills should just go ahead and forfeit their season. "Don't bother playing the games," ESPN sez. "They have geezers in the front office!"
IDBillzFan Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 I don't know why ESPN doesn't just stick to airing music videos.
Mile High Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 Are we really that bad!? 715150[/snapback] Do you work for Fox Sports? CBS?
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted June 28, 2006 Author Posted June 28, 2006 Just out of curiosity, who was worse? 715406[/snapback] 49ers and Browns were worse than the Bills. Not surprising once you think about it. Do you work for Fox Sports? CBS? 715379[/snapback] uh no. I don't think they would allow a 17 year old to work at a major news station, yet.
cantankerous Posted June 28, 2006 Posted June 28, 2006 Are we really that bad!? 715150[/snapback] YES.
MDH Posted June 29, 2006 Posted June 29, 2006 I don't know why ESPN doesn't just stick to airing music videos. 715340[/snapback] By "music videos" do you mean reality TV?
HurlyBurly51 Posted June 29, 2006 Posted June 29, 2006 Well, 21st running game, 29th QBs, 30th WRs/TE's, and certainly bottom of the barrel in OL. Fairchild has his work cut out for him!
Dibs Posted June 29, 2006 Posted June 29, 2006 Is there any point in ranking QBs? Unless your entire team is super solid your QB situation is either 'good enough' or 'not good enough'. 'Not good enough' means you are actively seeking to upgrade at QB or you are relying on young QBs to develop(hoping like hell). Most teams fall into the 'not good enough' category so does it really matter if you are ranked 32nd or if you are ranked say....14th? Both teams would be looking to upgrade.
BB2004 Posted June 29, 2006 Posted June 29, 2006 Are we really that bad!? 715150[/snapback] Who did they have last? Hopefully JP can come out on fire this year.
Recommended Posts