Tortured Soul Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking...son=2006&week=0 28 (23) Bills 5-11-0 Craig Nall, J.P. Losman or Kelly Holmcomb? Well, their going to have to pick one of them, right?
mary owen Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking...son=2006&week=0 28 (23) Bills 5-11-0 Craig Nall, J.P. Losman or Kelly Holmcomb? Well, their going to have to pick one of them, right? 711811[/snapback] i can take compfort in thinking that the Sabres, Canes, Oilers, and the Miami Heat were probably pretty low on ESPN's power rankings prior to their respective seasons' start.
PromoTheRobot Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 i can take compfort in thinking that the Sabres, Canes, Oilers, and the Miami Heat were probably pretty low on ESPN's power rankings prior to their respective seasons' start. 711831[/snapback] When is ESPN going to publish the power rankings on their staff predictions? PTR
UnionAMG Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 When is ESPN going to publish the power rankings on their staff predictions? PTR 711843[/snapback] Is it possible to rank everybody at the bottom of the poll? Because that's where you'd have to put them for preseason power rankings
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking...son=2006&week=0 28 (23) Bills 5-11-0 Craig Nall, J.P. Losman or Kelly Holmcomb? Well, their going to have to pick one of them, right? 711811[/snapback] I'm actually surprised. I hadn't figured them to rank hire than 29.
Wiz Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 28 (23) Bills 5-11-0 Craig Nall, J.P. Losman or Kelly Holmcomb? Well, their going to have to pick one of them, right? 711811[/snapback] I think they're going to have to learn better grammar.
Realist Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking...son=2006&week=0 28 (23) Bills 5-11-0 Craig Nall, J.P. Losman or Kelly Holmcomb? Well, their going to have to pick one of them, right? 711811[/snapback] You must truly be a "Tortured Soul" if you are worried about power rankings before TC even starts.
Ramius Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 I'm actually surprised. I hadn't figured them to rank hire than 29. 711857[/snapback] Mort must be on vacation...otherwise we'd be ranked 33rd, behind the 31 other teams and tom donahoe
BuffaloWings Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 I think they're going to have to learn better grammar. 711863[/snapback] No kidding....that's pretty pathetic for an operation such as ESPN is.
Tortured Soul Posted June 21, 2006 Author Posted June 21, 2006 i can take compfort in thinking that the Sabres, Canes, Oilers, and the Miami Heat were probably pretty low on ESPN's power rankings prior to their respective seasons' start. 711831[/snapback] The heat must've been top 5. You must truly be a "Tortured Soul" if you are worried about power rankings before TC even starts. 711865[/snapback] You have no idea.
IDBillzFan Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 I'm actually surprised. I hadn't figured them to rank hire than 29. 711857[/snapback] Look, I know VABills is MIA, but of all people to take over his spelling acumen, why you???
syhuang Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 Mort must be on vacation...otherwise we'd be ranked 33rd, behind the 31 other teams and tom donahoe 711874[/snapback]
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 Look, I know VABills is MIA, but of all people to take over his spelling acumen, why you??? 711970[/snapback] It's worse than you think. Sudennlly, when I sit in my cheir, my feat no longir touch the floor. And I have this suddin strange erge to watch Daddy Day Care...
todd Posted June 21, 2006 Posted June 21, 2006 I have no problem where the Bills are ranked. They haven't shown anything yet. But the dolphins at 8 and the Giants at 11? That invalidates the entire list.
PatPatPatSack Posted June 22, 2006 Posted June 22, 2006 I have no problem where the Bills are ranked. They haven't shown anything yet. But the dolphins at 8 and the Giants at 11? That invalidates the entire list. 712032[/snapback] No, Dallas at number 7. Hah! That equates to about 11 or 12 wins. You think Drew and company hook up for 12 wins. Never say never. Never.
merlin Posted June 23, 2006 Posted June 23, 2006 ESPN NFL Power Rankings ... and unfortunately, it's probably not far from being wrong. But hey, at least we are ahead of the Jests! (#31). Patsies, Cowgirls, and Dolfelons all made the top 10. Hope the Bills can prove them wrong! GO BILLS!
John Adams Posted June 25, 2006 Posted June 25, 2006 No, Dallas at number 7. Hah! That equates to about 11 or 12 wins. You think Drew and company hook up for 12 wins. Never say never.Never. 712113[/snapback] TO will easily make that team a 12 win machine. He's a force.
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted June 25, 2006 Posted June 25, 2006 i can take compfort in thinking that the Sabres, Canes, Oilers, and the Miami Heat were probably pretty low on ESPN's power rankings prior to their respective seasons' start. 711831[/snapback] How would the Heat have been ranked any lower than #2 in the east, or #5 overall??
Pyrite Gal Posted June 25, 2006 Posted June 25, 2006 How would the Heat have been ranked any lower than #2 in the east, or #5 overall?? 713849[/snapback] ESPN seems fully aware of this as they clearly present this as their "opening" power rankings. Reality is certainly going to determine a lot. Its off-season and the boys are sitting around post NBA abd NHL season looking for off-serason stuff to do. What better amidst going on vacation than to try to reach a group consensus amidst guys who all sports fans wish they had as much time ion their hands to watch and think about games. It would be nice to see where individual "experts" are in their predictions about how they think the season will turn out. However, i doubt that folks like Clayton will subject themselves to the embarrassment of showing how wrong they often are.
Recommended Posts