Dan Gross Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Patience Grasshopper.This will be a fun team to watch for ten years and will, I guarantee will be in finals next year and will win it.! 701986[/snapback] If they can get past the Leafs....right?
Like A Mofo Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 There are no Hockey gods. 702099[/snapback] I could not agree more.
Ramius Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 There are no Hockey gods. 702099[/snapback] I could not agree more. 702100[/snapback] Its kind of like finding out theres no santa claus. But instead of finding your parents putting presents under the tree, all you find behind the curtain is lawn gnome gary bettman and his canadian jerkoffs pulling levers and throwing switches.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 There are no Hockey gods. 702099[/snapback] There must be. Nothing else can explain the horrid luck of losing four defensmen in ten games...
apuszczalowski Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 There are no Hockey gods. 702099[/snapback] No, there is one, but it likes toying with Buffalo for some reason. How else do you explain a team losin a top defencemen to a broken ankle, then another to a broken arm, then one pulling a groin muscle/hip flexor (after having heart problems) and then, before the biggest game of the series, another to a Staph infection in his leg??????????????? There was a higher power working against Buffalo this year, and I think it lives on Buffalo Misery
Kelly the Dog Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 There must be. Nothing else can explain the horrid luck of losing four defensmen in ten games... 702106[/snapback] That's the point. No God would be that cruel. It's worse than a plague of raining frogs (named brind'amour). It certainly can't be to teach us a lesson. How many do we friggin' need?
Dr. K Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 That's the point. No God would be that cruel. It's worse than a plague of raining frogs (named brind'amour). It certainly can't be to teach us a lesson. How many do we friggin' need? 702152[/snapback] "As flies to wanton boys are we to the [hockey] gods, They kill us for their sport." W. Shakespeare
X. Benedict Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 That's the point. No God would be that cruel. It's worse than a plague of raining frogs (named brind'amour). It certainly can't be to teach us a lesson. How many do we friggin' need? 702152[/snapback] Hockey Gods are not omnipotent; they are somewhere between gremlins and fate. They control the odd bounce, the freaky and the weird. Some people even think they help them get laid. They get angry when streaks are not honored - like Carolina touching the Price of Wales cup in 2002. All you Atheists might get big toe blisters. Just warning you.
Kelly the Dog Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Hockey Gods are not omnipotent; they are somewhere between gremlins and fate. They control the odd bounce, the freaky and the weird. Some people even think they help them get laid. They get angry when streaks are not honored - like Carolina touching the Price of Wales cup in 2002. 702156[/snapback] Then they are not gods, they are linesmen. They just think they're gods.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Then they are not gods, they are linesmen. 702158[/snapback] I always thought they were more like lawn gnomes, myself. At least we know they're not pixies or faeries...those would be the Flyers...
X. Benedict Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Then they are not gods, they are linesmen. 702158[/snapback] Never thought of it that way. Sounds too simple. That ruins my entire Pseudo-Religious-Cult-Schema. I guess I am going back to the whole Monotheism thing - at least for the offseason. The friars already think I'm heterodox anyway.
Kelly the Dog Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Never thought of it that way. Sounds too simple. That ruins my entire Pseudo-Religious-Cult-Schema. I guess I am going back to the wholeMonotheism thing - at least for the offseason. The friars already think I'm a heterodox anyway. 702165[/snapback] What's a heterodox? Does that mean you only have sex with female doxes?
Acantha Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 What's a heterodox? Does that mean you only have sex with female doxes? 702170[/snapback] What's a Dox?
Kelly the Dog Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 What's a Dox? 702178[/snapback] Oh, he's talking about that crazy dingo.
X. Benedict Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 What's a heterodox? Does that mean you only have sex with female doxes? 702170[/snapback] Labels, Labels. I look forward to the day when people are not judged by the animals they bugger.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Labels, Labels. I look forward to the day when people are not judged by the animals they bugger. 702188[/snapback] Judge not, lest you be forced to drive a Honda Fit.
X. Benedict Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Judge not, lest you be forced to drive a Honda Fit. 702191[/snapback] I would never sign a lesting agreement for a Honda Fit. Now if it was an old LeSabre? I might lest.
taterhill Posted June 2, 2006 Author Posted June 2, 2006 I would never sign a lesting agreement for a Honda Fit. Now if it was an old LeSabre? I might lest. 702199[/snapback] LeSabre..sweet ride..
BillsFanNC Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 I believe that clip was from a few seasons ago, the game was a sell-out due to CA singing before the game. When he was done more than half of "the best fans in the NHL" had gone home before the opening face-off. Yeah, NC is hockey crazy.
Recommended Posts