buckeyemike Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 I think it has to do with what apuszczalowski said...it's a prejudice against Buffalo against some of the other towns that consider themselves garden spots. If this guy is property of the Kings, it means he'd have to live in Los Angeles. As Albert Brooks was told in the movie "Defending Your Life" by a bureaucratic angel: "There is no hell. Although Los Angeles is getting close." I guess you have to weigh the high cost of living out there and the natural disasters versus good weather and bikinis year-round. Also, the last time I checked, the Kings were no great shakes as a franchise, and haven't been since Gretzky left. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 I guess you have to weigh the high cost of living out there and the natural disasters versus good weather and bikinis year-round. 701393[/snapback] Prbably just interested in fake west coast tig bitties... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts