damj Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 The sky is falling .... the sky is falling!!!!! Wide Right, Home Run Throwback, No Goal .... we're doomed!!!!!!!!! That's it .... I'm jumping off of the bandwagon (but please save my seat .... I'll be back on after saturday ).
Orton's Arm Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I do think Ottawa has the better team overall. The sooner the Sabres put this series away, the happier I'll be.
Dan Gross Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I do think Ottawa has the better team overall. The sooner the Sabres put this series away, the happier I'll be. 690181[/snapback] Do you think they need to bench JP?
RayFinkle Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 The sky is falling .... the sky is falling!!!!! Wide Right, Home Run Throwback, No Goal .... we're doomed!!!!!!!!! That's it .... I'm jumping off of the bandwagon (but please save my seat .... I'll be back on after saturday ). 689993[/snapback] Laughing at and mocking the sports gods is not advised.
Orton's Arm Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Do you think they need to bench JP? 690217[/snapback] Why are you giving up on JP after only zero hockey games? Don't you know it takes time to develop as a hockey player? Enjoy your hot pockets.
tennesseeboy Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Ottawa is pretty darn good, but I think we'll put them away. Might be a long series though.
stinky finger Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I fully expect another game back in Buffalo. Now if we need to go back to Ottawa for a.......gulp!.......deciding game 7?!?!?! MAN OVERBOARD!!!
Like A Mofo Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 If the Sabres lose this series...I retire as a Bills and Sabres fan.
stinky finger Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 If the Sabres lose this series...I retire as a Bills and Sabres fan. 690234[/snapback] You should treat them (Sabres/Bills) as seperate entities. The Bills will give you reason to jump later this year.
Dan Gross Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Why are you giving up on JP after only zero hockey games? Don't you know it takes time to develop as a hockey player? Enjoy your hot pockets. 690223[/snapback] I'm talking Dumont, just based on having the same accursed initials as a certified NFL bust. I mean, Vanek had more goals than JP in the regular season....why is Vanek on the bench and JP on the first line?
X. Benedict Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I'm talking Dumont, just based on having the same accursed initials as a certified NFL bust. I mean, Vanek had more goals than JP in the regular season....why is Vanek on the bench and JP on the first line? 690239[/snapback] Vanek backchecks with his purse. Also I think Dumont's hands are a little better when he is moving in traffic, which the Briere line always seems to be doing. Vanek is a better guy to post in front of the net and to screen shots. But with Chara on D, nobody is going to waste time trying that.
syhuang Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 One of the offseason moves I don't agree with Marv is the signing of Fowler, doesn't he know Briere, Drury, and Connolly play great at C?
smokinandjokin Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 The Sabres are still in VERY good shape in the series. Ottawa played with their backs up against the wall, and the Sabres didn't have the intensity they've had in the first three games....And it was still only 2-1, with both Ottawa goals going in off of Buffalo players' sticks!!! Emery was sharp for once, but was cooked at least twice (Max somehow missing the whole goal and Drury (IIRC) ringing the crossbar.) Like the other three games, this could've gone either way. Before the series, there were plenty of Sabres in 6/Sabres in 7 predictions. Why should that change now? I think Sabres in 6 is very reasonable. There is a good chance that: a) the Sabres don't come out flat for the first 20 minutes for the rest of the series. b) Emery has just played the best game that he can play, and will be hard-pressed to match that. Wacky fact- the team with more shots is 0-4 in the series.
Dan Gross Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Vanek backchecks with his purse. Also I think Dumont's hands are a little better when he is moving in traffic, which the Briere line always seems to be doing. Vanek is a better guy to post in front of the net and to screen shots. But with Chara on D, nobody is going to waste time trying that. 690246[/snapback] Chill, I was just busting on Holcomb's arm. You don't think I was serious do you?
X. Benedict Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Chill, I was just busting on Holcomb's arm. You don't think I was serious do you? 690254[/snapback] I guess I did. I logged on fighting a hockey hangover
zow2 Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I fully expect another game back in Buffalo. Now if we need to go back to Ottawa for a.......gulp!.......deciding game 7?!?!?! MAN OVERBOARD!!! 690233[/snapback] I'm absolutely panicing! Not because of our infamous Buffalo choke jobs but because Ottawa probably is a bit better and has more depth. They've awoken. Miller is better than Emery right now so that's our edge (up until last night). I fully expect this to come down to game 7 on Wed night and I will be shaking like a heroine addict all throughout.
Ozymandius Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I think Ottawa blows us out in Game 5, say, 4-1 and we come back and win Game 6.
X. Benedict Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I think Ottawa blows us out in Game 5, say, 4-1 and we come back and win Game 6. 690280[/snapback] I don't see that. Ottawa has some very tired legs.
drnykterstein Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 time to start naming the great comeback by the sens in 06. how about "The Collapse"
Like A Mofo Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 time to start naming the great comeback by the sens in 06. how about "The Collapse" 690282[/snapback] Sounds about right to me
Recommended Posts