Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 does anyone know how fast willis mcgahee is and what his forty time is after the knee injury, DOES ANYONE KNOW 689933[/snapback] Come on, people, doesn't anyone know? FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SOMEONE PLEASE TELL HIM!!!!!
eball Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 And just like in football, quality is not soley dicated by how fast you can go in a straight line. 690209[/snapback] In life, however, the ability to write coherently is vastly underrated.
X. Benedict Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 In life, however, the ability to write coherently is vastly underrated. 690267[/snapback] Soley Dicated sounds like a spoiled porn star.
Dan Gross Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Come on, people, doesn't anyone know? FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SOMEONE PLEASE TELL HIM!!!!! 690256[/snapback] Some number under 5.0. That's all I have for now. Gotta queue up my responses for when he/she starts the same thread a week from now.
cantankerous Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Having a runningback with 4.8 speed vs a runningback with 4.3 speed is meaningless? 690077[/snapback] No it really doesn't. Timed 40's are run without the football, without defenders, without the damn GAME. He's fast enough, and i'd rather have a stronger Willis that almost always falls forward after getting hit...than a lighter, faster Willis that gets knocked back.
Helmet_hair Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 Porsche probably runs in the 12's..... 690428[/snapback] I hate bragging but I’m running low 13’s at the track with a stock Mach 1 with a CAI and predator tune.
NorthWesternBill Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 I hate bragging but I’m running low 13’s at the track with a stock Mach 1 with a CAI and predator tune. 690469[/snapback] Boy this forum really has dropped off in the last week, latic acid built up after all the angry draft backlash that was here? I need the damn training camps to open up so there will be actual TOPICS! EDIT: Is there a better forum out there?
Coach Tuesday Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 Definitely file a formal request under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL). You are a citizen and taxpayer of WNY and you are ENTITLED to this information. The Bills, the media, heck - the NFL and all of God's Earth exist soley for your benefit. There are legions of people who have been waiting for you to ask this question, and are already pouring over stats and information at your behest. LONG LIVE THE KING.
Helmet_hair Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 Boy this forum really has dropped off in the last week, latic acid built up after all the angry draft backlash that was here? I need the damn training camps to open up so there will be actual TOPICS! EDIT: Is there a better forum out there? 690489[/snapback] Sorry but it’s a little tough talking football in the off season but if you like I could bad mouth a player or two or maybe the coaches, I don’t think that’s been done yet!
Buffaloed in Pa Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 Nobody know`s because it`s a little slow.I`d have to guess in the 4.6-4.7 range. Wonder what the bus ran carrying that keg at Pitt. As long as he keep`s the chain`s moving I guess it`s good enough.He`s never going to get that speed back with that injury. I know I have been there. Let`s Go Buffaaaallloooooo.Wassup wiff dat.
BuffaloBilliever Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 I'd give him the same speed as a mid-range DB, maybe the speed of a Strong Safety. He's got acceleration and moderate agility, but his speed in the open field is lack-luster.
buffaloboyinATL Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 In life, however, the ability to write coherently is vastly underrated. 690267[/snapback] Wow thanks for pointing out one gramatical error for me. I am a better person for it. You must be proud. I didn't realize that mistakingly leaving one letter out of a word made a sentence incoherent.
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 I'd give him the same speed as a mid-range DB, maybe the speed of a Strong Safety. He's got acceleration and moderate agility, but his speed in the open field is lack-luster. 690686[/snapback] The only thing I gotta question about this, how many times has he been in the open field?
damj Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Willis is faster than a speeding bullet! Able to leap tall defenders in a single bound! Look, out on the field! It's an Alexander, it's a Johnson, no, it's SuperWillis!
HereComesTheReignAgain Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Wow thanks for pointing out one gramatical error for me. I am a better person for it. You must be proud. I didn't realize that mistakingly leaving one letter out of a word made a sentence incoherent. 690747[/snapback] Mistakingly???
eball Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Wow thanks for pointing out one gramatical error for me. I am a better person for it. You must be proud. I didn't realize that mistakingly leaving one letter out of a word made a sentence incoherent. 690747[/snapback] Well, gee, if you want me to nitpick, you actually left a letter out of two words.
Nanker Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Well, gee, if you want me to nitpick, you actually left a letter out of two words. 691800[/snapback] Is nit-pick hyphenated? I always get hung up on hyphens, en dashes, em dashes, and the elipsis and the like.
buffaloboyinATL Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Mistakingly??? 691795[/snapback] yes, that is a word. Just as acceptable as saying mistakenly. http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/mistakingly
stuckincincy Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Is nit-pick hyphenated? 691809[/snapback] No. The hyphenation of two nouns/verbs is not new, but that splitting usage has always resided in the contempory trend aspect of the language. It comes, it goes. The hyphen, besides its utility function of splitting a word in a printed column, retains its usage as preceding a summary, and separating statements - sometimes, with presumption and irritation - I might add...
Recommended Posts