Like A Mofo Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 ....forward. They are sending him out as an enforcer.... 689561[/snapback]
Catholic Guilt Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 Clements22 - NICE AVATAR! Did you make that gem?
Like A Mofo Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 Clements22 - NICE AVATAR! Did you make that gem? 689616[/snapback] Found that on another site...was too classic to pass up!!!
The Dean Posted May 11, 2006 Author Posted May 11, 2006 What about Bucky's article from today's Buff News? Anyone buying it? 689547[/snapback] Just read it. i agree with almost all of what Bucky said...and that was basically the point of this thread. One thing i disagreed with is his counting post-hits against Emery. The post is part of the goalie's equiptment.
Rubes Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 Just read it. i agree with almost all of what Bucky said...and that was basically the point of this thread. 689633[/snapback] Right, although it sounds like some here think that if he is even less than 100% he should and would play. Bucky is saying no way does he play unless he is truly 100%, which sounds right. And I agree, the post is just as much of a no-goal as a shot wide, so why bother.
Recommended Posts