Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 If McCargo becomes a player, who cares where he was drafted. People's memories are short. Value is a creation of the Kipers and Kiper-clones. It means absolutely nothing. That's right, nothing. Because players still have to play. Mike Williams was a "value" pick, and how did he work out? We got an A+ for that 2001 draft. What did that get us? Draft grades are like pissing your pants. It gives you a warm feeling for a little while. PTR 682170[/snapback] Sure. But if he turns out to be too light or unable to play, it's a disatrous pick. It works both ways. But, you're right, we (I) should be looking at the bright side and hoping for the best.
obie_wan Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 1) No, but then again, Milloy didn't need to be cut. Vincent did. 2) See #1. 3) You could say that. But if you're insinuating that the Tackles were strenghts, I'd say you were stretching it a bit. Peters performed admirably given his background and Gandy was, well, Gandy. 4) The possibility, yes. But in order to make a difference, they'll have to be a HUGE upgrade, IMO. 5) Yes. A passrushing DE would have been nice. 6) define waste. McCargo seems to be a reach, IMO. If reaching is wasting, then yes, it's a waste. 681706[/snapback] Milloy make the big hit every so often. However, he is an absolute liability in coverage. The couldn't even think about running a cover 2 with him on the field.
Recommended Posts