Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 2, 2006 Posted May 2, 2006 CATO 681401[/snapback] A raving liberal posts quoting a raving liberal newspaper article about a raving liberal think tank's view that some Republicans "get it"...and while quoting, original said raving liberal casts a legitimate checks and balances issue into a bull sh-- partisan issue. Original said raving liberal must get a nice, tingly feeling in his loins from casting everything as a partisan issue. It's just about the only explanation for his otherwise inexplicably stupid behavior.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 2, 2006 Posted May 2, 2006 Original said raving liberal must get a nice, tingly feeling in his loins681769[/snapback] Goddamn you Tom, I'm intoxicated and that was fukken hilarious!
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 Goddamn you Tom, I'm intoxicated and that was fukken hilarious! 681830[/snapback] On alcohol or the Sabres? Cable guys got the cable in the new house installed just in time for me to catch the game. 5-0 now in Philly...damn...
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 On alcohol or the Sabres? Cable guys got the cable in the new house installed just in time for me to catch the game. 5-0 now in Philly...damn... 681903[/snapback] And if it wasn't for switching over to the lame ass Habs... I would have caught the 7th goal.
TPS Posted May 3, 2006 Author Posted May 3, 2006 A raving liberal posts quoting a raving liberal newspaper article about a raving liberal think tank's view that some Republicans "get it"...and while quoting, original said raving liberal casts a legitimate checks and balances issue into a bull sh-- partisan issue. Original said raving liberal must get a nice, tingly feeling in his loins from casting everything as a partisan issue. It's just about the only explanation for his otherwise inexplicably stupid behavior. 681769[/snapback] I must be out of touch if the CATO institute is now considered liberal and the Financial Times is a liberal newspaper. Of course, given the politics of this board, Libertarians are now considered "liberal" by the arbiter of objectiveness... Tom, Dick, and Harry...I can't figure out which one you are...
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 I must be out of touch if the CATO institute is now considered liberal and the Financial Times is a liberal newspaper. Of course, given the politics of this board, Libertarians are now considered "liberal" by the arbiter of objectiveness... Tom, Dick, and Harry...I can't figure out which one you are... 682063[/snapback] People here tend to think that the "LIB" in libertarian is coincidence. Such a string of three dirty letters. I think we need to change it to republitarian for the wonder boys here...
sweet baboo Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 A raving liberal posts quoting a raving liberal newspaper article about a raving liberal think tank's view that some Republicans "get it"...and while quoting, original said raving liberal casts a legitimate checks and balances issue into a bull sh-- partisan issue. Original said raving liberal must get a nice, tingly feeling in his loins from casting everything as a partisan issue. It's just about the only explanation for his otherwise inexplicably stupid behavior. 681769[/snapback] CATO institute = libertarian think tank
Ghost of BiB Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 CATO institute = libertarian think tank 682157[/snapback] Don't get me started on "think tanks"... To give you an idea, I was spoken to about joining one as an associate. That should scare anyone here.
Chilly Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 Don't get me started on "think tanks"... To give you an idea, I was spoken to about joining one as an associate. That should scare anyone here. 682529[/snapback] Consider me scared.
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 Don't get me started on "think tanks"... To give you an idea, I was spoken to about joining one as an associate. That should scare anyone here. 682529[/snapback] Even me?
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 Almost anyone here. 682557[/snapback] I would love to swim in a think tank!
Ghost of BiB Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 I would love to swim in a think tank! 682599[/snapback] No, you wouldn't. Doesn't take long for the water to get cold.
GG Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 No, you wouldn't. Doesn't take long for the water to get cold. 682660[/snapback] I figured the opposite. The water would get to body temperature level with everyone pissing in the tank. (See, I said piss.)
Lori Posted May 3, 2006 Posted May 3, 2006 I figured the opposite. The water would get to body temperature level with everyone pissing in the tank.(See, I said piss.) 682869[/snapback] Plus, wouldn't the accumulated hot air slow the evaporative cooling process?
TPS Posted May 4, 2006 Author Posted May 4, 2006 People here tend to think that the "LIB" in libertarian is coincidence. Such a string of three dirty letters. I think we need to change it to republitarian for the wonder boys here... 682070[/snapback] Maybe DCDick is too busy posting here and elsewhere to actually read the article? Let's see, the CATO institute is Libertarian; the Financial Times is Britain's equivalent of the Wall Street Journal (but the lemmings bought his diatribe). Oh, wait, I get it, they must be anti-constitution republicans....
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 4, 2006 Posted May 4, 2006 No, you wouldn't. Doesn't take long for the water to get cold. 682660[/snapback] I have a Mustang immersion suit/PFD handy. I can last for days before hypothemia sets in.
Recommended Posts