elcrusho Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 SS - DT - CB - FS - DT I guess were set with our Offense?
rnmac Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 There are 4 picks left. SS - DT - CB - FS - DT I guess were set with our Offense? 678113[/snapback]
Wiz Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 SS - DT - CB - FS - DT I guess were set with our Offense? 678113[/snapback] Have you forgotten? We have an o-line laced with all-pro's.
Brandon Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I think they feel they're better off finishing as much rebuilding on one side of the ball as possible. Improving the defense should keep us in most games this fall until we can improve the offense next year. This looks like an actual rebuilding plan (and yes, it will take 2-3 years) instead of trying to slap a bandaid on both sides of the ball in one offseason.
elcrusho Posted April 30, 2006 Author Posted April 30, 2006 hmmm I thought I said in my original post that ...'maybee we will draft 4 straight Offensive players'
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I think they feel they're better off finishing as much rebuilding on one side of the ball as possible. Improving the defense should keep us in most games this fall until we can improve the offense next year. Just asking for your opinion on this one...How much do you think our HORRIBLE offense will hurt a defense that will be starting rookies at 3 of 4 DB positions? Especially when the DL cannot apply pressure to the QB with four guys? This looks like an actual rebuilding plan (and yes, it will take 2-3 years) instead of trying to slap a bandaid on both sides of the ball in one offseason. OK, so, 2008-2009? Hopefully they'll still be in Buffalo
Lurker Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I think they feel they're better off finishing as much rebuilding on one side of the ball as possible. Improving the defense should keep us in most games this fall until we can improve the offense next year. This looks like an actual rebuilding plan (and yes, it will take 2-3 years) instead of trying to slap a bandaid on both sides of the ball in one offseason. 678124[/snapback] It sure looks that way. Back when we had the #2 defense, it took a lot of pressure off of the offense. I just hope they can keep JP upright.
udonkey Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 We won 9 games in '04 with a sh------- offense and great defense...
Brandon Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 Just asking for your opinion on this one...How much do you think our HORRIBLE offense will hurt a defense that will be starting rookies at 3 of 4 DB positions? Especially when the DL cannot apply pressure to the QB with four guys?OK, so, 2008-2009? Hopefully they'll still be in Buffalo 678130[/snapback] It certainly isn't going to help the defense, but again, they can't plug all the holes on the team in the draft. Just pointing out the strategy they appear to be taking. We'll have to see if it works out or not.
true_blue_bill Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 SS - DT - CB - FS - DT I guess were set with our Offense? 678113[/snapback] Yes, we should just address every single need all at once! Brilliant!
smapdi Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 At least our secondary is set for the next 5 years mininum. They are definately going to start picking Offense with our 2nd pick in the 5th
rnmac Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 Exactly. Anyone who thought after this draft we wou;d be good enough to go 12-4 is crazy. It takes time for a new crew to build a team. Be patient. They have been active in free agency. There are 4 more picks left. It certainly isn't going to help the defense, but again, they can't plug all the holes on the team in the draft. Just pointing out the strategy they appear to be taking. We'll have to see if it works out or not. 678149[/snapback]
ajzepp Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 At least our secondary is set for the next 5 years mininum. They are definately going to start picking Offense with our 2nd pick in the 5th 678160[/snapback] I'm guessing they go LB
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 Exactly. Anyone who thought after this draft we wou;d be good enough to go 12-4 is crazy. It takes time for a new crew to build a team. Be patient. They have been active in free agency. There are 4 more picks left. 678162[/snapback] What's the over/under on wins this year? I'm setting it at 6 and taking the under.
ndirish1978 Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I think people are forgetting that Jauron is first and foremost a defensive coach. Like Brandon said, he has an actual plan. I just think he has a bit of tunnel vision, concentrating on what he is most familiar with. I really wanted Bing, that's 2x in this draft the Raiders take the guy want
EC-Bills Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 We won 9 games in '04 with a sh------- offense and great defense... 678135[/snapback] Playing the NFC West didn't hurt either.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 Playing the NFC West didn't hurt either. 678184[/snapback]
true_blue_bill Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I think people are forgetting that Jauron is first and foremost a defensive coach. Like Brandon said, he has an actual plan. I just think he has a bit of tunnel vision, concentrating on what he is most familiar with. I really wanted Bing, that's 2x in this draft the Raiders take the guy want 678183[/snapback] And I like having a good defense more than a good offense. Play good D and run the damn ball! Go Sabres!
elcrusho Posted April 30, 2006 Author Posted April 30, 2006 Yes, we should just address every single need all at once! Brilliant! 678151[/snapback] Right how stupid of me to forget about our Pro Bowlers in Gandy and Anderson on the Left side
Fixxxer Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I'm guessing they go LB 678166[/snapback] I think they go DE, McClover?
Recommended Posts