Jump to content

I think the Bills are being reactive


Recommended Posts

I think they loved Whitner, but got afraid after Huff was gone that someone might grab Whitner so they reached for him rather than risk a tradedown.

 

Likewise McCargo, though there were no DTs taken after picks of Ngota and Bunckley, perhaps they viewed onr of the DEs taken as being a flexile guy so that they did not have room to risk to take McCargo.

 

If they had Whitner as the best SS on their board and enough questions about Ngota's inconsistency and Bunkley's character that they viewed MCargo as the best choice at DT this draft makes some sense. If they get an OL player with their 3rd who they wanted life is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...