Kelly the Dog Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I was taken aback by the #1 as everyone. Hated it. I dig McCargo, however, and didnt thnk he would be available in #2. IF we get a good prospect as an OL in round three, this really could turn out to be a good draft. Regardless, no one knows and won't know for 2-4 years.
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I was taken aback by the #1 as everyone. Hated it. I dig McCargo, however, and didnt thnk he would be available in #2. IF we get a good prospect as an OL in round three, this really could turn out to be a good draft. Regardless, no one knows and won't know for 2-4 years. 675478[/snapback] I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need.
DrDawkinstein Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 i was more surprised than dissappointed with the first pick, like the second. i think right now its a fair-good draft, depending on the 3rd.,
RayFinkle Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. 675609[/snapback] The point of it is that we have a lot of needs. Giving up a 3rd in a deep draft to move up 15 spots for a guy that might have lasted until the 3rd is brutal.
DrDawkinstein Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 id just like to point out that everyone's major gripe with TD was that he always drafted the flashy pick and never addressed (boring) needs. now we're seriously addressing needs and everyone is ready to jump off the roof...
BringBackAndre Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I was upset originally, but I think we need to trust Marv. He seems to have a plan while TD just drafted the best player.
slothrop Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 uhhhhh - we traded our third round pick for one of the worst trade bluders in recent memory.
EndZoneCrew Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 uhhhhh - we traded our third round pick for one of the worst trade bluders in recent memory. 675661[/snapback] who is that?
inkman Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. 675609[/snapback] Maybe Winston Justice will still be on the board.
jlk.billsfan Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The point of it is that we have a lot of needs. Giving up a 3rd in a deep draft to move up 15 spots for a guy that might have lasted until the 3rd is brutal. 675627[/snapback] Unlikely to last to us in the third I wouldn't call it "brutal" I like the fact that we are willing to go by our convictions and not the concensus
slothrop Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 we traded our second and third round pick for the McCargo pick, who would have been there with our second round pick. This draft is terrible! The players may turn out to be good - but our draft strategy is awfull. So now we get two players in the first day of the draft when we should have traded down to pick up an extra pick to exit day one with four players.
CosmicBills Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Who's the big OL from Pitt? Will he slide to the Bills in the third??
slothrop Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Unlikely to last to us in the thirdI wouldn't call it "brutal" I like the fact that we are willing to go by our convictions and not the concensus 675688[/snapback] WE DO NOT HAVE A THIRD ROUND PICK!!!!!!!! PAY ATTENTION!
Astrobot Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 By my calculations, we'll have 3 players, 2 defense and 1 offense (probably), by the end of Day 1.
Zac Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 we traded our second and third round pick for the McCargo pick, who would have been there with our second round pick. This draft is terrible! The players may turn out to be good - but our draft strategy is awfull. So now we get two players in the first day of the draft when we should have traded down to pick up an extra pick to exit day one with four players. 675691[/snapback] How do you know he would have been there?
Alaska Darin Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 WE DO NOT HAVE A THIRD ROUND PICK!!!!!!!! PAY ATTENTION! 675697[/snapback] We had two. We traded one. That leaves one. Settle down.
iommi Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 we have the 70th pick in the third, from tenn. for henry trade....
Rico Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 we have the 70th pick in the third, from tenn. for henry trade.... 675723[/snapback] 35 more picks till then, maybe the Deuce will slide!
BADOLBILZ Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. I hope there is a decent OT waiting for us in the 3rd. So far we drafted 2 positions of need. 675609[/snapback] 2 down, 10 to go. When do we start drafting the difference makers? Next year?
MikeSpeed Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The Bills are buying Cadillacs (Good Players) but paying Ferrari money for them. Come on people, the draft is all about value.
Recommended Posts