Jrock6986 Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 says he fits Perry Fewell's scheme perfectly. I dont understand whose going to play OL
drnykterstein Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 says he fits Perry Fewell's scheme perfectly. I dont understand whose going to play OL 675454[/snapback] not winston justice
Alaska Darin Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I hope he's right. At this time it looks like a HUGE reach, especially considering we gave up 2 early picks in what's supposed to be a deep draft.
WhitnerIsAGod Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Not to mention -- who were they afraid was going to reach for this guy? Certainly it wasn't Carolina. Carolina has a defensive line already. That's why they are a playoff team.
30dive Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I am certain that he is right...regarding the fit.......But with Justice sitting there, I am also pretty darn certain that McCargo could have been there for our next pick. This just makes no sense.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I hope he's right. At this time it looks like a HUGE reach, especially considering we gave up 2 early picks in what's supposed to be a deep draft. 675467[/snapback] Waaait... Mighty marv might have made a...*gasp* MISTAKE?
Kelly the Dog Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I hope he's right. At this time it looks like a HUGE reach, especially considering we gave up 2 early picks in what's supposed to be a deep draft. 675467[/snapback] This will actually be a pretty good indication in a couple years of whether the Bills scouting department is good or bad. Because, clearly, the Bills LOVED Whitner, and thought remarkably high of McCargo, too. Who knows if they will be good or bad but clearly the brass loved both of these guys. It wasn't a "he was our top player" when he clearly wasnt kind of choice.
Coach Tuesday Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 It wasn't a "he was our top player" when he clearly wasnt kind of choice. 675530[/snapback] You mean, like Roscoe Parrish?
Ralonzo Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 says he fits Perry Fewell's scheme perfectly. I dont understand whose going to play OL 675454[/snapback] Problem #1: We have a guy designing our scheme that used to sing for Jane's Addiction. Problem #2: Jets just drafted the guy who's going to kick McCargo's ass twice a year.
Max997 Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I still dislike the Whitner pick but I dont have a problem with McCargo
Alaska Darin Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Honestly I thought we traded into that pick for Mangold. Imagine the shock on my face when the name John McCargo was announced. I seriously thought we got someone from Fleetwood Mac.
Rico Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Problem #2: Jets just drafted the guy who's going to kick McCargo's ass twice a year. 675539[/snapback]
KOKBILLS Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Problem #1: We have a guy designing our scheme that used to sing for Jane's Addiction. Problem #2: Jets just drafted the guy who's going to kick McCargo's ass twice a year. 675539[/snapback] on Prob #1...
Alaska Darin Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I still dislike the Whitner pick but I dont have a problem with McCargo 675545[/snapback] Gil Brandt agrees with you. Why do you say that?
VABills Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I hope he's right. At this time it looks like a HUGE reach, especially considering we gave up 2 early picks in what's supposed to be a deep draft. 675467[/snapback] We only gave up one pick. We got one for two. So we only gave up one.
apuszczalowski Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Honestly I thought we traded into that pick for Mangold. Imagine the shock on my face when the name John McCargo was announced. I seriously thought we got someone from Fleetwood Mac. 675554[/snapback] So we were going to trade into the 1st to get a player that we already have 2 guys at (Preston and Fowler?) Now we get our DT and everyone is complaing cause they believe we would have had him at our 2nd round pick (isn't that 20 picks away?)
WolfpackMania Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 So we were going to trade into the 1st to get a player that we already have 2 guys at (Preston and Fowler?) Now we get our DT and everyone is complaing cause they believe we would have had him at our 2nd round pick (isn't that 20 picks away?) 675574[/snapback] You guys might not like him now, but you will come to love McCargo, and he wouldnt have been there come your next pick, some teams really liked him
30dive Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Again I like this guy but I really think he was a stretch based on what we "paid' for him. Brandt rates him as the 3rd best DT in the draft behind, Ngata and Bunkly. The question that still is looming is who is protecting JP's backside?
apuszczalowski Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 You guys might not like him now, but you will come to love McCargo, and he wouldnt have been there come your next pick, some teams really liked him 675594[/snapback] I'm defending the picks, I'm willing to see Marv and Jaurons full plan before I deem them Busts
Recommended Posts