disco Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Says Ravens said they were going to pick him at 13, and expected the call from them today....but also says about an hour ago the bills told his agent they'd be taking him at #8.
ans4e64 Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 see, so everyone saying he would be there at 15..... stfu
Kmac Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 who cares if hes there at 15, he still isnt worth top 20
jarthur31 Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Says Ravens said they were going to pick him at 13, and expected the call from them today....but also says about an hour ago the bills told his agent they'd be taking him at #8. 674815[/snapback] That doesn't make any sense. They all ready have an All-World safety.
John Adams Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The Bills filled a position of desparate need. Ngata and Bunkley both had question marks--Triplett helps fill the D-line hole. Whitner does not have question marks--he's a fast strong hard-hitting safety who will maul on special teams. The Ravens would have nabbed him at 12, so taking him at 8 might not have been so bad. If the Bills had an offer from Detriot, AZ, or St. Luois, then they could have risked the trade, but it sounds like they got one of the only impact players (for them) available at that pick.
SDS Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The Bills filled a position of desparate need. Ngata and Bunkley both had question marks--Triplett helps fill the D-line hole. Whitner does not have question marks--he's a fast strong hard-hitting safety who will maul on special teams. The Ravens would have nabbed him at 12, so taking him at 8 might not have been so bad. If the Bills had an offer from Detriot, AZ, or St. Luois, then they could have risked the trade, but it sounds like they got one of the only impact players (for them) available at that pick. 674855[/snapback] I live here in Baltimore and I never heard a word about S being considered for them. Does Ed Reed mean anything to you?
MDH Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The Bills filled a position of desparate need. 674855[/snapback] Why was that a position of desperate need? Oh, because Marv cut the starter. Milloy wasn't great but with him back there (healthy) SS is not a desperate need.
Like A Mofo Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 who cares if hes there at 15, he still isnt worth top 20 674850[/snapback] WHy? because the 'experts' say so???
smapdi Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 imagine ed reed and donte whitner back there... sounds pretty good
Arkady Renko Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I live here in Baltimore and I never heard a word about S being considered for them. Does Ed Reed mean anything to you? 674871[/snapback] I thought there was talk he can play FS + CB as well. Would that explain it? Maybe what I heard was bull.
BillsSouth Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 That doesn't make any sense. They all ready have an All-World safety. 674853[/snapback] Baltimore wanted Ngata all along - so they made Buffalo pick Whitner believing he wouldn´t be there at 15. By deceiving Buffalo, they assured their man would be there when they picked, although they needed to trade with Cleveland to be sure of that. If Baltimore didn´t want Ngata so badly, would they have traded up? Think a little...
Beerstm Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The Bills filled a position of desparate need. Ngata and Bunkley both had question marks--Triplett helps fill the D-line hole. Whitner does not have question marks--he's a fast strong hard-hitting safety who will maul on special teams. The Ravens would have nabbed him at 12, so taking him at 8 might not have been so bad. If the Bills had an offer from Detriot, AZ, or St. Luois, then they could have risked the trade, but it sounds like they got one of the only impact players (for them) available at that pick. 674855[/snapback] best and probably most accurate post i've read today
Max997 Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 see, so everyone saying he would be there at 15..... stfu 674840[/snapback] yeah, like he wouldnt want to put a spin on it himself the Ravens wanted Ngata and ended up getting him and wouldnt have taken Whitner ahead of him
SilverNRed Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Says Ravens said they were going to pick him at 13, and expected the call from them today....but also says about an hour ago the bills told his agent they'd be taking him at #8. 674815[/snapback] Listened to the whole interview. He sounded SHARP. Yeah, like everyone else, I wished we could trade down and get another pick but I'm feeling a lot better about the pick now. I think the Bills were targetting this guy all along.
John Adams Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 So what should the Bills have done? Draft a 2 down Ngata or Bunkley? Get a grip. The Bills need guys who can play EVERY down. Whitner will. Right now. And he'll play special teams. And he doesn't have Bunkley's baggage. It's a good pick. Just not a sexy one.
Ball'n Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 The Ravens wanted Whittner. But Buffalo took him so their #2 was Ngata maybe.
MDH Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 So what should the Bills have done? Draft a 2 down Ngata or Bunkley? Get a grip. The Bills need guys who can play EVERY down. Whitner will. Right now. And he'll play special teams. And he doesn't have Bunkley's baggage. It's a good pick. Just not a sexy one. 674908[/snapback] How is Bunkley a two-down player? Sure they'll rotate DTs but Bunkley can play on any down.
Zac Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 DT is all I heard this morning for B'more. 674902[/snapback] My friend who works for TSN said that they had a love affair for Whitner and Jimmy Williams.
Recommended Posts