Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

While I have no doubt Modrak signed off on Whitner as being an excellent prospect, taking him some 10-15 spots higher than he should've been speaks volumes about how green Marv is as a GM.

 

No way Donahoe makes this pick at 8.

 

Once again, we raise eyebrows in the draft, but this time for all the wrong reasons.

 

Further slipping into Bolivian, Buffalo.

Posted
  SoCal Pat said:
While I have no doubt Modrak signed off on Whitner as being an excellent prospect, taking him some 10-15 spots higher than he should've been speaks volumes about how green Marv is as a GM.

 

No way Donahoe makes this pick at 8.

 

Once again, we raise eyebrows in the draft, but this time for all the wrong reasons.

 

Further slipping into Bolivian, Buffalo.

674590[/snapback]

Donahoe would have drafted Leinhart.

Posted
  Corp000085 said:
You're right, donahoe would have picked a 5'4" wide receiver.

674598[/snapback]

While Donahoe didn't address the team's needs, he did draft for value.

Posted
  Wiz said:
While Donahoe didn't address the team's needs, he did draft for value.

674614[/snapback]

 

 

Yeah...and it got us far! :(

Posted
  Corp000085 said:
You're right, donahoe would have picked a 5'4" wide receiver.

674598[/snapback]

 

No, Donahoe would have done exactly what he did in 2001 when he got BOTH Nate Clements and Travis Henry.

Posted
  ajzepp said:
No, Donahoe would have done exactly what he did in 2001 when he got BOTH Nate Clements and Travis Henry.

675032[/snapback]

 

So basically he would magically repeat his best draft this year despite blowing it the past few yrs.

Posted
  SoCal Pat said:
While I have no doubt Modrak signed off on Whitner as being an excellent prospect, taking him some 10-15 spots higher than he should've been speaks volumes about how green Marv is as a GM.

 

No way Donahoe makes this pick at 8.

 

Once again, we raise eyebrows in the draft, but this time for all the wrong reasons.

 

Further slipping into Bolivian, Buffalo.

674590[/snapback]

 

5-11

Posted
  ajzepp said:
No, Donahoe would have done exactly what he did in 2001 when he got BOTH Nate Clements and Travis Henry.

675032[/snapback]

That's what I think too.

Posted

Donahoe picked McGahee when it seemed fairly clear that he would have been available much further down due to concerns about his knee. In fact, Drew R. told McGahee to make it look like teams were calling him when they were not.

 

Donahoe could have gotten WM later--he was played and was a fool by similar logic.

Posted
  JohnnyB said:
5-11

675067[/snapback]

 

is that your prediction for the Bills 2006 regular season record, or you prediction for the height of their next draft pick?

Posted

Ridiculous post. What do YOU know? Do YOU know more about building a team for this system than Jauron/Levy/Modrak?

 

 

Talk about overreaction.

 

The Rams destroyed the Bills chances of executing a trade with the Broncos. Teams know who other teams are going to take. The Broncos knew they could get Cutler by trading with the Rams, which allowed them to get their guy OUT of the top 10, which is also key.

 

The Bills didn't have enough leverage to execute a fair value trade, so they took the guy they liked the most for their system.

 

He's very good. Give these guys a chance. To ask for Tom Donahoe back is laughable.

×
×
  • Create New...