bbb Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 I just read in the News that the Campbell hit has made them decide to discontinue it................It always seemed a little off to me - a strange dynamic between car craches, violence, etc...........But, couldn't they see this one coming?
stevestojan Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Oh god... MORE "PC" GOODNESS FOR EVERYONE!!! Give me a frigging break. Campbell's hit was one of the only hits actually worth a replay out of the Sabres in the last 3 seasons.
dib Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 But, couldn't they see this one coming? Umberger didn't.
Like A Mofo Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 How in the world can the Sabres get rid of the Carubba Collision after Game 2...that was a classic....Nedved, meet Derian Hatcher!
Like A Mofo Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 Oh god... MORE "PC" GOODNESS FOR EVERYONE!!! Give me a frigging break. Campbell's hit was one of the only hits actually worth a replay out of the Sabres in the last 3 seasons. 672384[/snapback] I work in Princeton, and I work with a few Flyers fans...one of them here in particular is a big time Flyers fan and not ONCE did he complain about the hit..in fact he was impressed by it..what is the huge deal? And Umberger is back...what a joke if they pull the plug on this
smokinandjokin Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 I was at a Sabres-Bruins game in early March, and they typically show the two potential hits for the Carrubba Collision on the Jumbotron, and then the crowd votes via noise which one it should be. The two hits from that game were so lame, the crowd booed them both mercilessly. The "Why Guy" was on the mike, and he said, "I guess the booing was louder for #2, so we'll go with that!" The worst is, at the arena, they include sound effects like a big crash and breaking glass, and the hits were pathetic. Easily could've been included in the Miro Satan archive.
Recommended Posts