BuffaloRebound Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 I don't think Marv would trade up unless it is a player at a need position. It's gotta be a LT or DT they are targeting at the end of the 1st round. If Ferguson is not their at #8, then it's probably Ngata, then Winston at #26.
nuklz2594 Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 take lendale white late in the first round to motivate wm
N.Y. Orangeman Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Probably off, but, if rumors are correct (yeah, I know...), Marv might be thinking about Cutler at #11 and is seeking OL help at #26.
Mark VI Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 why? 672100[/snapback] I bet it's contingent on us trading down from #8 and aquiring extra picks. I can't see us giving up a 2nd and one of our 3rds to move up for anyone late in Round 1, leaving us with only 1 more day 1 pick. We need too much.
bartshan-83 Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 This just sounds kinda funny. I can hear the Bears brass now. "Dropping to 41 would be fine, but 42, what are !@#$ing kidding me? Who wants to pick that late?" 672147[/snapback] No sh--...my thoughts exactly! This smacks of Clayton just making something up. They say that this has been one of the hardest drafts in memory to predict. The 3 QBs are all wildcards, no one knows where DBrick is going and there was even doubt about the hottest prospect ever, Reggie Bush, going 1st. Buuuuuuut...somehow the Bears know that they guy they want will last to #40 or 41, but not 42. Get a new job Johnny.
Peter Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 take lendale white late in the first round to motivate wm 672324[/snapback] Who would motivate Lendale? P.S. Did Lendale motivate Willis when he overcame what could have been a career ending injury? P.P.S Did Lendale motivate Willis to be the fastest Bills RB to gain 2,000 yards (even though he was playing behind a piss poor line)?
OnTheRocks Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 I see that 2007 #1 being dangled. 672107[/snapback] man...that would really piss me off.
OnTheRocks Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 they could be crossing their fingers that Bunkley will fall to #26 and they can take Ngata and Bunkley. the possibilities are endless!
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Possible reasons wr- Santonio Holmes te- Leonard Pope or Marcedes Lewis ot- Winston, McNeil og- davin jospeh c- nick mangold lb- Bobby Carpenter de- Kiwanuka, Hali dt- Gabe Watson, John McCargo cb- antonio cromartie (I wish but he'll probably be gone before 27) tye hill, s- Jimmy williams(I know he was a corner he's a safety in the nfl though) Jason Allen, Donte Whitner, KO Simpson some of these guys will probably be gone, but one of them could be the reason. My guess is either winston, mccargo or a safety.
Acantha Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Who would motivate Lendale? P.S. Did Lendale motivate Willis when he overcame what could have been a career ending injury? P.P.S Did Lendale motivate Willis to be the fastest Bills RB to gain 2,000 yards (even though he was playing behind a piss poor line)? 672381[/snapback] You tell him!!! PPPSSSS Did he motivate Willis to ALL 5 of his TD's last season?????
buffalo mike2 Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 they could be crossing their fingers that Bunkley will fall to #26 and they can take Ngata and Bunkley. the possibilities are endless! 672396[/snapback] Bunklet a DE, Ngata at nose. BRILLIANT!!!!!!
Lurker Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 ...This doesnt make too much sense. Maybe if the Bears were picking in the top 15 I could see it, but who in the heck would the Bills want in the late first? 672113[/snapback] Mangold?
Lurker Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 I would be on board with the move if Tamba Hali was still available at that point. Something tells me that this guy will be a very productive pass rusher for many years. It is surprising to me that his stock has fallen so far after once being considered a top 10-15 pick.If we could start the draft with DaBrick and Hali, I would be very pleased. 672135[/snapback] I think Hali's too much of a tweener, so I hope that's not where they're going.
Acantha Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Bunklet a DE, Ngata at nose. BRILLIANT!!!!!! 672407[/snapback] As impossible as that is....THAT would be something I could get behind. Aaron, Ngata, Tripplett, Bunkley?? Holy crap.
millstone twnsp nj bills fan Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 Manigold 672118[/snapback] BINGO!
Max997 Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 KFFL is reporting: Bills | Talking potential trade with Bears Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:05:05 -0700 John Clayton, of ESPN.com, reports the Buffalo Bills are attempting to acquire a second first round pick. The Chicago Bears, who own the No. 26 pick, may be interested in dealing. KFFL NFL Hotwire Page 672098[/snapback] I think the trade being discussed is actually the Bills moving up from their 2nd round pick rather then down from their first round pick Chicago gave up a 3rd round pick to Carolina when they signed Ricky Manning Jr so the talk is they would like to pick up another pick(s) to make up for that pick...dont know if I like this trade idea for the Bills unless they are able to trade down and pick up another 2nd then I like it
Tipster19 Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 IF this were to be true, could coupling the #8 and #26 picks be a more inexpensive way to move up to the #2 pick overall? Ooh, Saturday can't come soon enough!
Max997 Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 IF this were to be true, could coupling the #8 and #26 picks be a more inexpensive way to move up to the #2 pick overall? Ooh, Saturday can't come soon enough! 672519[/snapback] I dont think they would make the trade for 26 until the bears were on the clock....I also only think they make this trade if they end up trading down in the first round and getting additional pick(s)
IndyJay1234 Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 you are correct sir 672256[/snapback] It makes me wonder if they take Huff at 8 and then pull this. The defense would be pretty much fixed and it got a heck of a loy younger in one season. It does not address the o-line but with yesterdays signing and Fowler...... makes me wonder. Huff is the last of the supposed elite 8. Sorry. This was in response to picking the DT Josh McCargo
Recommended Posts