Stussy109 Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Miek Mayock on NFL Network yesterday was saying Philadelphia Eagles may be an ideal trade candidate for us picking at #15. Apparently they covet Haloti Ngata who is a perfect fit for their system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 15 would be great Bunkley might still be available and certainly there will be a number of first rate offensive linemen available. If we could get a second rounder for the trade I'd jump at it. I might even be tempted with a third rounder for a trade that high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 How does Phili's 15th pick and their 2nd round pick match up with #8 on the value chart? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 How does Phili's 15th pick and their 2nd round pick match up with #8 on the value chart? 671658[/snapback] I dont know but I dont like it. Trade up if the opportunity is there and draft Brick or Hawk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tomcat Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 How does Phili's 15th pick and their 2nd round pick match up with #8 on the value chart? 671658[/snapback] Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 1 3,000 33 580 65 265 97 112 129 43 161 27 193 14.2 2 2,600 34 560 66 260 98 108 130 42 162 26.6 194 13.8 3 2,200 35 550 67 255 99 104 131 41 163 26.2 195 13.4 4 1,800 36 540 68 250 100 100 132 40 164 25.8 196 13 5 1,700 37 530 69 245 101 96 133 39.5 165 25.4 197 12.6 6 1,600 38 520 70 240 102 92 134 39 166 25 198 12.2 7 1,500 39 510 71 235 103 88 135 38.5 167 24.6 199 11.8 8 1,400 40 500 72 230 104 86 136 38 168 24.2 200 11.4 9 1,350 41 490 73 225 105 84 137 37.5 169 23.8 201 11 10 1,300 42 480 74 220 106 82 138 37 170 23.4 202 10.6 11 1,250 43 470 75 215 107 80 139 36.5 171 23 203 10.2 12 1,200 44 460 76 210 108 78 140 36 172 22.6 204 9.8 13 1,150 45 450 77 205 109 76 141 35.5 173 22.2 205 9.4 14 1,100 46 440 78 200 110 74 142 35 174 21.8 206 9 15 1,050 47 430 79 195 111 72 143 34.5 175 21.4 207 8.6 16 1,000 48 420 80 190 112 70 144 34 176 21 208 8.2 17 950 49 410 81 185 113 68 145 33.5 177 20.6 209 7.8 18 900 50 400 82 180 114 66 146 33 178 20.2 210 7.4 19 875 51 390 83 175 115 64 147 32.6 179 19.8 211 7 20 850 52 380 84 170 116 62 148 32.2 180 19.4 212 6.6 21 800 53 370 85 165 117 60 149 31.8 181 19 213 6.2 22 780 54 360 86 160 118 58 150 31.4 182 18.6 214 5.8 23 760 55 350 87 155 119 56 151 31 183 18.2 215 5.4 24 740 56 340 88 150 120 54 152 30.6 184 17.8 216 5 25 720 57 330 89 145 121 52 153 30.2 185 17.4 217 4.6 26 700 58 320 90 140 122 50 154 29.8 186 17 218 4.2 27 680 59 310 91 136 123 49 155 29.4 187 16.6 219 3.8 28 660 60 300 92 132 124 48 156 29 188 16.2 220 3.4 29 640 61 292 93 128 125 47 157 28.6 189 15.8 221 3 30 620 62 284 94 124 126 46 158 28.2 190 15.4 222 2.6 31 600 63 276 95 120 127 45 159 27.8 191 15 223 2.3 32 590 64 270 96 116 128 44 160 27.4 192 14.6 224 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Who cares how it adds up on the value chart, on draft day, that chart goes out the window and deals are made to the highest bidder and to the GM willing to spend the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Who cares how it adds up on the value chart, on draft day, that chart goes out the window and deals are made to the highest bidder and to the GM willing to spend the most. 671707[/snapback] that couldnt be more incorrect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 that couldnt be more incorrect 671713[/snapback] So TD gave chart value to Dallas for the rights to draft JP? So The Chargers got chart value for the trade to the Giants for Manning? The Coaches and GM's don't sit there with a value chart for picks, They make deals for what they have in their mind what they feel the draft spot is worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Y. Orangeman Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 14th is likely too far too move down if we are interested in improving the lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Yeah, only top ten picks will imprvoe this line. There are alot of good linemen available in the mid to late 1st, and in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Taking one of those guys in the top ten would be reaching for alot of them and not worth it. For dropping to 14 from 8, you can expect more then just one pick coming our way in return making it a good spot to trade to. Sure we don't get one of the talking heads can't miss/best linemen to come into the league in years (well year since the last draft actually) and we may get a very good linemen and a couple extra picks. If not, we use the spot to draft a 5 foot WR or a potential top ten pick before a serious career threatening injury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 This is ideal. If we drop 3 positions and still get Ngata/Bunkley... Marv will be seen as a genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 This is ideal. If we drop 3 positions and still get Ngata/Bunkley... Marv will be seen as a genius. 671806[/snapback] But if we trade down and both of them are off the board and Marv is forced to select a guy like Jimmy Williams or Ernie Sims...The Wall will explode and call for Marv's head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_wag Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 This is ideal. If we drop 3 positions and still get Ngata/Bunkley... Marv will be seen as a genius. 671806[/snapback] i'd be happy with justice in that scenerio as well...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Y. Orangeman Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Yeah, only top ten picks will imprvoe this line. There are alot of good linemen available in the mid to late 1st, and in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Taking one of those guys in the top ten would be reaching for alot of them and not worth it. For dropping to 14 from 8, you can expect more then just one pick coming our way in return making it a good spot to trade to. Sure we don't get one of the talking heads can't miss/best linemen to come into the league in years (well year since the last draft actually) and we may get a very good linemen and a couple extra picks. If not, we use the spot to draft a 5 foot WR or a potential top ten pick before a serious career threatening injury 671745[/snapback] Yeah, stud tackles won't help improve the lines. Instead, let's take lesser-skilled linemen and accumulate more picks. Talent usually wins out over depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 But if we trade down and both of them are off the board and Marv is forced to select a guy like Jimmy Williams or Ernie Sims...The Wall will explode and call for Marv's head. 671813[/snapback] Very true.... very true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ1 Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Yeah, only top ten picks will imprvoe this line. There are alot of good linemen available in the mid to late 1st, and in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Taking one of those guys in the top ten would be reaching for alot of them and not worth it. For dropping to 14 from 8, you can expect more then just one pick coming our way in return making it a good spot to trade to. Sure we don't get one of the talking heads can't miss/best linemen to come into the league in years (well year since the last draft actually) and we may get a very good linemen and a couple extra picks. If not, we use the spot to draft a 5 foot WR or a potential top ten pick before a serious career threatening injury 671745[/snapback] Yeah, our current line (and depth?) was built from the scumsucking 50, for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 No trade stay where you are draft the best player, Marv has already said he likes where he is and has a record of picking at the spot where he is. Im sure if someone throws out an unbelievable deal that no one would pass up than he would do it. All of this talk of trading is giving me a headache. This is Marv and co. first draft they dont want to blow it by trading around and losing a potential stud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 I'd like to take Huff. Get the DT from either Michigan or Miami, and the OT from Miami, and we're in very good shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 But if we trade down and both of them are off the board and Marv is forced to select a guy like Jimmy Williams or Ernie Sims...The Wall will explode and call for Marv's head. 671813[/snapback] You are correct Sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Who cares how it adds up on the value chart, on draft day, that chart goes out the window and deals are made to the highest bidder and to the GM willing to spend the most. 671707[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts