Estro Posted April 26, 2006 Posted April 26, 2006 Woodson to Packerslink Seems like too much money for a guy who's been injury prone.
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted April 26, 2006 Posted April 26, 2006 Woodson to Packerslink Seems like too much money for a guy who's been injury prone. 671397[/snapback] When you're the packers you're pretty much gonna have to overspend on players, but yes it is a lot of money not only for someone who's injury prone but who's better off playing safety
MadBuffaloDisease Posted April 26, 2006 Posted April 26, 2006 Part of the agreement to get Brett to make his mind up NOW?
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 26, 2006 Posted April 26, 2006 Nate ClementsPay him! 671430[/snapback] The deal for Nate Clements just zoomed out of the Bills price range, methinks.
Lurker Posted April 26, 2006 Posted April 26, 2006 The deal for Nate Clements just zoomed out of the Bills price range, methinks. 671432[/snapback] Yep, not at $45 million with $10.5 million in the first year. That's not good value.
mike22nc Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Yep, not at $45 million with $10.5 million in the first year. That's not good value. 671440[/snapback] That's not that big of a deal, with only 10.5 mil in bonus money. I would be suprised if Clements accepted any less than 15-18 up front and 50 total over 7 years. Don't know how Woodson signing for less than that really affects Clements at all...
ans4e64 Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 brett favre said that who they brought in as free agents would make or break his decision. They havent really done much to this point, i wonder if favre knew a deal was in the works for woodson.
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 brett favre said that who they brought in as free agents would make or break his decision. They havent really done much to this point, i wonder if favre knew a deal was in the works for woodson. 671539[/snapback] Ahhh who knows, I believe he was never going to retire, he figured this year couldnt have been any worse so he decided to give it one last shot. Maybe to grab some of Marinos records. I dont think he wanted to go out like he did.
Ramius Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 Taking into account salaries and bonuses and such, woodson's deal is essentially a 3 yr deal for 18 million. Also, his 10.5 mil "bonus" was not signing bonus, so its not prorated. Essentially then can cut him almost scot free after 3 seasons if hes not playing up to par.
roscoeparrishfan Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 He does know how to catch interceptions so maybe he will be good with favre. they should play him at wideout.
a player to be named later Posted April 27, 2006 Posted April 27, 2006 I think they will play him at CB for three years, then restructure and start him at saftey. Packers are not that far away. They were believed to be a playoff team before the start of the season. They pull off a trade for Walker. Get Hawk and some o-line help and they don't look half bad.
Recommended Posts