1billsfan Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 I do. I also want to see Lee Evans in as the starting number 2 receiver. These are our only wildcards we can throw at the Pats and I think they are ready for the challenge. What's the downside exactly? Ruining the offensive explosion we've been seeing the last two games? But alas, unfortunately this will not happen.
ofiba Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 i want to see willis run for 200 yards and 3 touchdowns.
DC Tom Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 I do. I also want to see Lee Evans in as the starting number 2 receiver. These are our only wildcards we can throw at the Pats and I think they are ready for the challenge. What's the downside exactly? Ruining the offensive explosion we've been seeing the last two games? But alas, unfortunately this will not happen. 49596[/snapback] Absolutely. Nothing against Travis...well, except it is something against Travis. He can't pick up a blitz to save his life. From what I can see, there's no appreciable drop-off in rushing productivity with McGahee in there...and he actually improves the passing game simply by being able to block. Start the boy already...
Yard Monkey Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Only if the "flow of the game" allows it for McGahee. Otherwise, I'd stick with Henry, a proven NFL running back Do we even know if Evans is going to be any good at the pro level? So we should stick him in the game against the #1 ranked team in the NFL and expect him to bail the offense out. Expect a few plays from each, but they are a long way from blue chip players.
MattyT Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 It doesn't matter to me which back starts as long McGahee sees more touches and they get more creative with how the two backs are used.
Dawgg Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Nope. He's not ready yet. Let Travis take the pounding while McGahee gets fully ready. I still think he's tentative and is more useful in spot duty as opposed to an every down role. I say use him more but still ride Trav. I do. I also want to see Lee Evans in as the starting number 2 receiver. These are our only wildcards we can throw at the Pats and I think they are ready for the challenge. What's the downside exactly? Ruining the offensive explosion we've been seeing the last two games? But alas, unfortunately this will not happen. 49596[/snapback]
Paco Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 I would at least like to see McGahee in there more oftento help pick up the blitz. Henry sucks at it and Willis seems to be pretty good at it. Put them BOTH back there more often, for Christ's sake.
Indy Dave Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Willis won't (and shouldn't) start on Sunday, but I'd like to see him get much more action than he did vs. Oakland. After all, we did spend a #1 pick on the guy. But I don't care if Joe Burns plays. I just want to win.
PromoTheRobot Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 I don't believe starting McGahee over Henry will make much difference as long as #11 is handing the ball off. To me it's rearranging the deck chairs while the Titanic sinks. PTR
drnykterstein Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 no dont start mcgahee, but give him 10-12 carries. no leave evans where he is. reed is playing well, dont mess it up.
John from Riverside Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 I don't believe starting McGahee over Henry will make much difference as long as #11 is handing the ball off. To me it's rearranging the deck chairs while the Titanic sinks. PTR 49669[/snapback] Willis should be out their as the 3rd down back.....
stuckincincy Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Maybe someday they'll get around to working Josh Reed into the backfield.
dib Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Only of he can block the right defensive end. Or the left defensive end. Or..........
Peter Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Whether he starts or not, he definitely needs more touches. I was under the impression that MM and TC had devised an offense that would include both players on the field at the same time. I was really looking forward to the mismatches that this would cause. We shall see . . . .
jad1 Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 I want to see the Bills run the ball more than 40 times against the Pats. Who starts and what the breakdown of carries is makes no difference to me.
R. Rich Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Willis should get a few more reps, but he is not a savior of any kind. He's made progress in that he runs without regard to the knee, but he still hasn't regained that burst of speed that set him apart at Miami.
Mark VI Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Mularkey needs to realize that if we have a 1st and goal inside the 5, MaGahee needs to be in there. Henry has been tripping over his own feet trying to reach the line of scrimmage. This is where Willis could make a positive contribution.
Peter Posted September 29, 2004 Posted September 29, 2004 Mularkey needs to realize that if we have a 1st and goal inside the 5, MaGahee needs to be in there. Henry has been tripping over his own feet trying to reach the line of scrimmage. This is where Willis could make a positive contribution. 49782[/snapback] Exactly.
Recommended Posts