Ghost of BiB Posted April 22, 2006 Posted April 22, 2006 Mollohan The WSJ is usually pretty accurate. I'm thinking that having the lead Democrat on the Ethics Committee (of all things) under that type of cloud can't be helping the cause.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 22, 2006 Posted April 22, 2006 Mollohan The WSJ is usually pretty accurate. I'm thinking that having the lead Democrat on the Ethics Committee (of all things) under that type of cloud can't be helping the cause. 667478[/snapback] I think the only purpose ethics rules serve for politicians is to let them know what they shouldn't openly talk about...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 22, 2006 Author Posted April 22, 2006 I think the only purpose ethics rules serve for politicians is to let them know what they shouldn't openly talk about... 667486[/snapback] I don't know anything about the guy, but damn...the ethics committee? Don't you sort of want one of your "cleaner" members sitting there as your party lead?
UConn James Posted April 22, 2006 Posted April 22, 2006 I don't know anything about the guy, but damn...the ethics committee? Don't you sort of want one of your "cleaner" members sitting there as your party lead? 667494[/snapback] Then again, Ted Kennedy chaired it a while back.... Don't be surprised when big-group decisions make no sense to the individual.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 22, 2006 Posted April 22, 2006 I don't know anything about the guy, but damn...the ethics committee? Don't you sort of want one of your "cleaner" members sitting there as your party lead? 667494[/snapback] He probably is...
Recommended Posts