Ghost of BiB Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Mollohan The WSJ is usually pretty accurate. I'm thinking that having the lead Democrat on the Ethics Committee (of all things) under that type of cloud can't be helping the cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Mollohan The WSJ is usually pretty accurate. I'm thinking that having the lead Democrat on the Ethics Committee (of all things) under that type of cloud can't be helping the cause. 667478[/snapback] I think the only purpose ethics rules serve for politicians is to let them know what they shouldn't openly talk about... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 22, 2006 Author Share Posted April 22, 2006 I think the only purpose ethics rules serve for politicians is to let them know what they shouldn't openly talk about... 667486[/snapback] I don't know anything about the guy, but damn...the ethics committee? Don't you sort of want one of your "cleaner" members sitting there as your party lead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 I don't know anything about the guy, but damn...the ethics committee? Don't you sort of want one of your "cleaner" members sitting there as your party lead? 667494[/snapback] Then again, Ted Kennedy chaired it a while back.... Don't be surprised when big-group decisions make no sense to the individual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 I don't know anything about the guy, but damn...the ethics committee? Don't you sort of want one of your "cleaner" members sitting there as your party lead? 667494[/snapback] He probably is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts