Thailog80 Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Updated Yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 No way does WR Chad Jackson get past us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 No way does WR Chad Jackson get past us. 666849[/snapback] Uncle Fester's bulb would blow. Still, that would rival picking Vince Young for pure entertainment value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACor58 Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Updated Yesterday 666847[/snapback] I saw that too. If we don't trade out of the spot I like the pick. It allows us to keep Peters at RT and move Justice to LT (Even though Justice played RT at USC). I know that a lot of us are scared off after the Fat Mike pick but I feel like he is a much safer pick at #8 than either Ngata or Bunkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 This guy is way off. No way does Matt Leinart drop all the way to the Raiders. Come on now! Also, the Bills biggest need is Defensive Tackle. Justice would surprise me to come at number 8 for the Bills. Although I personally would be happy with Justice, Bunkley, Ngata (who I belive the Bills will take), Huff, or in my dreams AJ Hawk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I do have a feeling that the Titans will pick Vince Young though. Jeff Fisher couldn't hold his smile down when talking about Vince Young. Did anybody else notice that last night? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACor58 Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I do have a feeling that the Titans will pick Vince Young though. Jeff Fisher couldn't hold his smile down when talking about Vince Young. Did anybody else notice that last night? 666860[/snapback] Fisher has man love for Vince Young? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tomcat Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I think we trade down 3-4 spots....get an extra 3rd and still get a great player....my 2 cents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan III Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Updated Yesterday 666847[/snapback] Bunkley falling to #24.. We could trade down with Dallass, pick up 2nd & 4th rnders and still get Bunkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Based this draft I think we should do exactly that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Perhaps depending on the 1 through 7 picks, OT Eric Winston (MIA-FL) might be high on the Bill's board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted April 21, 2006 Author Share Posted April 21, 2006 Bunkley falling to #24.. We could trade down with Dallass, pick up 2nd & 4th rnders and still get Bunkley. 666882[/snapback] If Dallas wants our spot so badly I think we should fleece them like they did us a few years back when we wanted JP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Bunkley falling to #24.. We could trade down with Dallass, pick up 2nd & 4th rnders and still get Bunkley. 666882[/snapback] I'm skeptical of Bunkley. Also, McCargo - Tim Anderson redux? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan III Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 If Dallas wants our spot so badly I think we should fleece them like they did us a few years back when we wanted JP. 666885[/snapback] Getting Bunkley at #18 would be huge.. The Bills 1st day picks could be something like this: #18- Bunkley #42- Lutui or Joseph or Gilles #49- Whitworth #70- Watkins #73- Oshinowo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Getting Bunkley at #18 would be huge.. The Bills 1st day picks could be something like this: #18- Bunkley #42- Lutui or Joseph or Gilles #49- Whitworth #70- Watkins #73- Oshinowo 666894[/snapback] I think " IT " Moved... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan III Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I think " IT " Moved... 666896[/snapback] After reading the Ourlads view of W. Justice, I wouldn't even draft him at #42. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogbyte Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I do not see many teams wanting to move up in the draft, many are looking to move down. This is because of the cost of rookies drafted in the top 15. many get very good money but do not work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 If both Ngata and Bunkley are still on the board at #8 trading down into the mid first to a team salivating to get at an expected top 5 player who unexpectedy fell to #8 (it would be Leinart in this mock would make to much sense for the Bills not to see it and be able to resist. By getting a couple of extra first day choices (the seeming market rate for trading a #8 given the evidence this year of the SF/Broncos trade and the static general draft choice value comparisons). The Bills would get far greater value than picking Justice who though a good and potentially great player does not equal getting three good and 3 probably not but potentially great players. Trade down! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick in RaChaCha Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 If both Ngata and Bunkley are still on the board at #8 trading down into the mid first to a team salivating to get at an expected top 5 player who unexpectedy fell to #8 (it would be Leinart in this mock would make to much sense for the Bills not to see it and be able to resist. By getting a couple of extra first day choices (the seeming market rate for trading a #8 given the evidence this year of the SF/Broncos trade and the static general draft choice value comparisons). The Bills would get far greater value than picking Justice who though a good and potentially great player does not equal getting three good and 3 probably not but potentially great players. Trade down! 666931[/snapback] Yes trade down!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Updated Yesterday 666847[/snapback] And Justice for all... Article from ESPN, sorry if already posted. Justice League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts