millbank Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Take this test and see how Evil you are, its a Salon link still the test is fun Are You Evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Your Machiavelli score is: 56 You are a low Mach, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonz Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 76 here..Yikes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy Chief Navy Pride Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 85 Baby High Mach!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 68, damn I was shooting for 69. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 I find Machiavelli fascinating, but I only scored a 46 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 58 Low Mach Take this test and see how Evil you are, its a Salon link still the test is fun Are You Evil 666018[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100Your Machiavelli score is: 77 You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions. Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick in* england Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 74 for me. High Mach... :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 95. I probably would have scored higher if the test could take into account why I disagree with PT Barnum: suckers are born WAY more frequently than every minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 95. I probably would have scored higher if the test could take into account why I disagree with PT Barnum: suckers are born WAY more frequently than every minute. 666086[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 I taught Machiavelli every thing he knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 69 High Mach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kegtapr Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 75 - Big Mac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 95. I probably would have scored higher if the test could take into account why I disagree with PT Barnum: suckers are born WAY more frequently than every minute. 666086[/snapback] what did ieatcrayonz score? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 what did ieatcrayonz score? 666130[/snapback] He is Machiavelli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 37 - I'm the one PT Barnum was talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millbank Posted April 20, 2006 Author Share Posted April 20, 2006 80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 what did ieatcrayonz score? 666130[/snapback] 95. Same as me. Of course, no one who scored a 95 on the test would admit to being ieatcrayonz anyway...unless they weren't, and chose to lie to distract you from the true ieatcrayonz, in true Machiavellian fashion... And the funny thing is...apparently only you and Ed don't know who ieatcrayonz is. Which doesn't say a whole hell of a lot for your powers of deduction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 37 - I'm the PT Barnum was talking about. 666137[/snapback] I have a 2:30 available and a bridge burning a hole in my pocket. Shall I schedule you in? I'm a 69 by the way.......good number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts