Nick in RaChaCha Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 Will Marv build a champion level team or go for immediate needs. Version 1 AKA plug holes A DT - most likely our first selection in the draft an OT or OG - Second round selection and a Safety... That is just to have a chance of going 7 - 9 for the season If we are willing ot have a 4- 12 season and build for the future We should draft V Davis or Huff in the first round followed by an OT then a G and then a DT I will be curious to see how marv will run this draft. Will he look building a championsip team in 4 years or a competitive team that might win 9 games in 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 Will Marv build a champion level team or go for immediate needs. Version 1 AKA plug holes A DT - most likely our first selection in the draft an OT or OG - Second round selection and a Safety... That is just to have a chance of going 7 - 9 for the season If we are willing ot have a 4- 12 season and build for the future We should draft V Davis or Huff in the first round followed by an OT then a G and then a DT I will be curious to see how marv will run this draft. Will he look building a championsip team in 4 years or a competitive team that might win 9 games in 2007 665679[/snapback] Huff might not even make it to #8, I just read today that the Raiders are really interested in him (especially if SF takes Davis and someone else takes Young) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 I still think I like Jimmy Williams better than Huff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 Trade down and we can get threse three in the first two rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfladave Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 Trade down and we can get threse three in the first two rounds. 665700[/snapback] I agree. This years draft seems tailor made for our needs. I'd love to trade down our first for a mid to late 1st and a couple of other day 1 picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 I can't see Huff. IF the DL doesn't improve run and pass pressure, he'll be another one running around to tackle a guy ten yards or more downfield. If they are successful in trading down, DT Claude Wroten, and DE's Tamba Hali and Mathias Kiwanuka seem to be possibilities. DT McCargo had the luxury of DE's Mario Williams and Manny Lawson on the line with him. I'm not sold on Bunkley...from what I've read, he's not noted for run-stopping. But I would like to see them spend the #8 on an OL if they remain at that position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 But I would like to see them spend the #8 on an OL if they remain at that position. 665707[/snapback] I'd like to see them try to move down 2-4 spots and pick up Justice. If they can't find a trade partner then just use the 8th pick on Justice. Then I’d like to see them pick up Deuce Lutui with the second round pick. The more I think about it the more it pisses me off that they cut Fat Sam. He wasn't a world-beater but he was serviceable. By cutting him it created a huge hole that has yet to be filled. This draft is deep at the DT position though and I see no reason to use the top pick on a DT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 I'd like to see them try to move down 2-4 spots and pick up Justice. If they can't find a trade partner then just use the 8th pick on Justice. Then I’d like to see them pick up Deuce Lutui with the second round pick. The more I think about it the more it pisses me off that they cut Fat Sam. He wasn't a world-beater but he was serviceable. By cutting him it created a huge hole that has yet to be filled. This draft is deep at the DT position though and I see no reason to use the top pick on a DT. 665717[/snapback] G Mark Setterstrom from Minnesota deserves some interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 G Mark Setterstrom from Minnesota deserves some interest. 665718[/snapback] The 4 Guards I hope they're targeting are Lutui,Spencer, Jean-Gilles and Joseph, since all can start immediately. Round 2 targets. Setterstrom is a Day 2 project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 The 4 Guards I hope they're targeting are Lutui,Spencer, Jean-Gilles and Joseph, since all can start immediately. Round 2 targets. Setterstrom is a Day 2 project. 665719[/snapback] Perhaps, perhaps not. From what I've read, and the little I've seen of him, he is a good pulling guard and brings his play downfield. I didn't advocate taking him in the 1st round, but I'm not sure he will be there in day 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Version 1 AKA plug holesA DT - most likely our first selection in the draft an OT or OG - Second round selection and a Safety... That is just to have a chance of going 7 - 9 for the season 665679[/snapback] i dont think we absolutely need a lineman to start, i think gandy, preston, fowler, villareal, peters isnt that bad i mean i would love a lineman to come in and replace someone, but i dont think its a bigger need than DT or Safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Grady Jackson is still available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Grady Jackson is still available 665750[/snapback] IIRC, he's injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 i think gandy, preston, fowler, villareal, peters isnt that bad 665745[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rev.Mattb74 ESQ. Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 This team needs offensive lineman, the only ones we have had the past decade have just been offensive. I feel that we have the best offensive line coach in the league and he cant make these guys competent. Justice at 8 (or D'Brick if hes there) or trade down. If we dont take Justice he will be gone shortly after us, I dont care if people think he is not worth an 8 spot if he is a good tackle for the next ten years I dont care if you trade up to a top five slot to get him. In round two get his teamate Lutui if he is still there. I dont care if we pick O-Linemen the entire draft, we aren't winning the SB this year anyway, fix a problem that has been a problem since Ritcher,Wolford,Ballard,Hull, and Devlin have left. Please for the love of God I cant take another year of our QB getting sacked as soon as he gets the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 665762[/snapback] In the way he stated that I can't say I disagree. If he said it the way you pasted it well then I'd blink at it too, but dt is a bigger need and it's arguable about safety, but our dline has no one outside of schobel, and maybe triplett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 In the way he stated that I can't say I disagree. If he said it the way you pasted it well then I'd blink at it too, but dt is a bigger need and it's arguable about safety, but our dline has no one outside of schobel, and maybe triplett. 665767[/snapback] As long as this team thinks this is a rebuilding year (which it obviously is to me) then I'd put a priority on young OL in the early rounds (as long as there are value picks available when the Bills select) and worry about DT later in day 1. If the DT doesn't pan out it'll be easier to find a DT next offseason than it will quality OL help. The bottom line is the Bills OLine is horrid. There's not a single guy on it that would be a starter on any of the better OLines in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 im not saying we dont need offensive lineman, i hope we can get 2 on just the first day, i mean that for starters, i think we need a DT and possibly a Safety starter before a lineman starter, but we definitely need lineman bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 sorry for that hooked on phonics post up there im tired lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 sorry for that hooked on phonics post up there im tired lol 665774[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts