IDBillzFan Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 I say we trade down to get free sex in the later rounds. But if we did that, would it still be free?
Ghost of BiB Posted April 19, 2006 Author Posted April 19, 2006 OH YOU GOT ME!!! 664941[/snapback] You're so easy.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 I say we trade down to get free sex in the later rounds. But if we did that, would it still be free? 664937[/snapback] PFW's reporting that the Texans are leaning towards taking Free Sex with their first-round pick. I know, they're supposed to take Reggie Bush...but why pay for it when you can get it free?
The_Real Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 I say we trade down to get free sex in the later rounds. But if we did that, would it still be free? 664937[/snapback] No, you are just given an extra back door option. Oral not included
ajzepp Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 The real question is, how can we keep Free Sex from moving to LA?
ans4e64 Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 its going to be funny to watch the number of views this thread gets lol
Lori Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 Nothing, I just thought I'd say free sex. 664930[/snapback] ...and see which deviants opened the thread? Heh. Oopsie. Never mind....
Ghost of BiB Posted April 19, 2006 Author Posted April 19, 2006 What is sex? 664984[/snapback] Something we used to read about.
Ramius Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 PFW's reporting that the Texans are leaning towards taking Free Sex with their first-round pick. I know, they're supposed to take Reggie Bush...but why pay for it when you can get it free? 664946[/snapback] The knock on free sex is that its measurables didnt match up at the combine. Word on the street is that free sex doesnt have the stamina to compete. Also, another negative of free sex is that it needs someone else to compliment it when running the cover-2.
IDBillzFan Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 The knock on free sex is that its measurables didnt match up at the combine. Word on the street is that free sex doesnt have the stamina to compete. Also, another negative of free sex is that it needs someone else to compliment it when running the cover-2. 664987[/snapback] But free sex ran his last 40 at 4.1 and if you think about it, what' better than free sex that free sex fast ?
Beerball Posted April 19, 2006 Posted April 19, 2006 I say we trade down to get free sex in the later rounds. But if we did that, would it still be free? 664937[/snapback] It would be free, but of inferior quality. Course you would get an extra pick too.
Recommended Posts