Frez Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 Wouldn't you rather have less picks and more quality players? Quanity or Quality?
ajzepp Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 Wouldn't you rather have less picks and more quality players?Quanity or Quality? 662615[/snapback] Both
Mark VI Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 In a deep draft like this one, you get Quality IN Quantity.
ajzepp Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 In a deep draft like this one, you get Quality IN Quantity. 662619[/snapback] Well said
Ozymandius Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 In a deep draft like this one, you get Quality IN Quantity. 662619[/snapback] Yep. You are on the ball with this draft. Thanks.
Frez Posted April 15, 2006 Author Posted April 15, 2006 How do you know already this is such a deep draft?
Rico Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 Both if possible, but most definitely quality over quantity.
KOKBILLS Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 I'd rather have both...Quality and Quantity is possible...That's what the Bills Need...
Ozymandius Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 How do you know already this is such a deep draft? 662786[/snapback] There are people here who follow college football. That this is a deep draft is pretty common acknowledged.
ExWNYer Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 How do you know already this is such a deep draft? 662786[/snapback] How do you know that by only staying in a higher slot that the Bills will get a quality player? Did Mike Williams tell you?
Frez Posted April 15, 2006 Author Posted April 15, 2006 How do you know that by only staying in a higher slot that the Bills will get a quality player? Did Mike Williams tell you? 662805[/snapback] No but all the other bust from rounds 2-7 told me. You know, in those other deep deep drafts.
frogger Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 I'd rather get one super star, and several good players, than two very good players and several good players. it's a two year plan, next year we might have more than 25 million in cap room to spend on the top free agents. lets get someone that is great (if possible) and then role players and good starters. We can not rebuild everything in this draft.
ajzepp Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 I'd rather get one super star, and several good players, than two very good players and several good players. it's a two year plan, next year we might have more than 25 million in cap room to spend on the top free agents. lets get someone that is great (if possible) and then role players and good starters. We can not rebuild everything in this draft. 662872[/snapback] What about three borderline superstars, one good role player who actually THINKS he's a superstar but in actuality is a pseudosuperstar, thirteen good players who aren't really starters but still make the team, and a high motor waterboy?
Dibs Posted April 16, 2006 Posted April 16, 2006 I get the impression a lot of people think that the higher the pick, the bigger the superstar. That is an incorrect assumption. The higher the pick, the higher the chance you get a superstar.(theoretically) Superstars however come from every round in the draft (& even undrafted) Busts only really come from the first day of the draft.(4th round down aren't expected to be good) I'm just hoping we end up with more McGees, Peters & Evens' & no Erik Flowers', Mike Williams' or even Kevin Thomas'.
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts