TheMadCap Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 So what if a graduate student at a NC university begins a relationship with another enrolled student over 19, not in any of the same classes, say a Chemist and a Business major??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerjamhead Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 http://www.wral.com/news/8696627/detail.html#Pics: http://www.schnittshow.com/heatherpics.html 662244[/snapback] Pervert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 So what if a graduate student at a NC university begins a relationship with another enrolled student over 19, not in any of the same classes, say a Chemist and a Business major??? 662376[/snapback] Must ban about 4 Donald Southerland movies as being subversive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 So what if a graduate student at a NC university begins a relationship with another enrolled student over 19, not in any of the same classes, say a Chemist and a Business major??? 662376[/snapback] I suppose, if the grad student has a TA position, then it's illegal. If they have an RA, it's not. It may be the law...but it's not a very good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Doesn't say anything about what type of school. Theoretically, by the letter of the law, if a middle-aged college professor starts dating a middle-aged college student, it's still a felony. As a practical matter, such a situation would never be prosecuted under the law. Which kind of highlights the stupidity of the law. 662326[/snapback] I'd be surprised if this particular law doesn't in a definitions section or introduction specify that "schools" are pre-K - 12 and exempts colleges, universities, post secondary trade schools, etc. The portion of the law attached to the article didn't address the issue, and I am too tired and care far too little about this issue to look up the NC law. It doesn't make the law much less ridiculous, as you could have a 22 year old senior get busy with a 17 or 18 year old prodigy student teacher and the 17 or 18 year old would technically be a felon. I wonder if they were 22 and 17 if the "victim" of the Class G felony would also be charged with being a perpetrator of a statutory felony on the back side? How touching, they could both wait for the other to get out of prison. Isn't young adult love in North Carolina romantic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 I'd be surprised if this particular law doesn't in a definitions section or introduction specify that "schools" are pre-K - 12 and exempts colleges, universities, post secondary trade schools, etc. The portion of the law attached to the article didn't address the issue, and I am too tired and care far too little about this issue to look up the NC law. 662585[/snapback] I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't...lots of examples of really stupid, poorly considered laws like that out there. But, like you, I don't care enough to check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 “Doesn’t matter the age.” 662250[/snapback] ...Since most high schoolers down South are usually between 19-30.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBTG81 Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Heather's Myspace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Heather's Myspace 662716[/snapback] Stalker? Write her in jail. You have a chance. Also, buy a lottery ticket. You have a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Stalker? Write her in jail. You have a chance. Also, buy a lottery ticket. You have a chance. 662723[/snapback] sounds like it's coming from someone with experience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Am I missing something..........This is not he one who got in trouble for cryptic messages on myspace, is it?............I don't even think this is the same Heather? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Ok, by the letter of the law, she was wrong... Morally, she was wrong. She banged a 19 year old SPECIAL ED student. Granted, you can be labelled special ed for having a heavy tongue or not being able to read large words, but he was a special ed student. Now, what will be the result of this? Worst case, she is conviced and has to appeal to eventually get the law to change to minor student instead of any student. She'll still lose her job. The law may change, but the district policy won't. God i love NC... That chick was in MY state! she could have worked at MY school! I'd have banged her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 having a heavy tongue 662828[/snapback] Maybe she was looking for a Gene Simmons type? I know, just wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 "is accused of having sex with a 19-year-old who was NOT her student" that says it all. we all just want to see the pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon in Pasadena Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 With the lights turned kinda low, you could make a case for her working out your Britney Spears fantasies. Not that I have any. I'm just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts