Jrock6986 Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Heres my bills mock draft. 2006 Bills Mock Draft I think Vernon Davis is there at 8 and the Rams decide they want to move up and grab him. Trade 8 for 11 and 77 1. Broderick Bunkley DT FSU 2. Marcus McNeil OT Auburn 3a. Anthony Smith S Syracuse 3b. Charles Spencer G Pitt 3c. Maurive Stovall WR ND 4. Kevin Boothe T Cornell 5a. Frostee Rucker DE USC 5b. Montavious Stanley DT Louisville 6. Cedric Humes RB Virginia Tech 7a. David Pittman CB. Northwestern St 7b. Jeff King TE, Virginia Tech
Kmac Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Keep this in your sig, cus when the draft happens I gaurantee the Bills don't draft a single player in your "mock"
marck Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Since you defined my mock as terrible, let me review yours; Bunkley & Stanley as defensive tackles over McCargo & Lewis. Not bad, same thought and same type of player. I prefer taking an OT higher and feel we get comparable value in using 2nd & 5th round picks at DT, however good thought. I prefer Justice over McNeil due to athletism, however both players could play LT as McNeil has great size/speed quickness ratio's. By using your #1 to trade down and get an extra pick, we get Bunkley and McNeil at 42. Totally acceptable. Anthony Smith vs Pat Watkins, prefer Watkins due to being bigger faster, and far more athletic and played against beter level of competition in a winning program, Syracuse is in a down conference and if a choice is available, prefer better athlete who played against better competition. Like the choice of Charles Spencer of Pitt at guard over my choice of Sims. However felt a greater need to get an OT so I could not trade down and Sims or Matua also played at power conferences and have comparable athletic talent. But I agree that the Bills do need a guard. We also agree that a defnesive tackle is needed, Anderson has a much higher upside then Rucker, who is more of a pass ruch specialist only, with limited run stop capability. Stovall is a luxury as we already have 9 WR's on the roster and is unnecessary. A running back is also needed and I prefer a guy like Robinson who also brings some additional skills to the table. At CB, I really like Devin Hester who has great skills for CB and will slip a bit in this draft. Tight End is not a position of need unless we take a Vernon Davis who I agree will be a special player, but with so many other needs is a luxary at this time. Now, don't you feel this is a better and more qualited response then yours. Heres my bills mock draft. 2006 Bills Mock Draft I think Vernon Davis is there at 8 and the Rams decide they want to move up and grab him. Trade 8 for 11 and 77 1. Broderick Bunkley DT FSU 2. Marcus McNeil OT Auburn 3a. Anthony Smith S Syracuse 3b. Charles Spencer G Pitt 3c. Maurive Stovall WR ND 4. Kevin Boothe T Cornell 5a. Frostee Rucker DE USC 5b. Montavious Stanley DT Louisville 6. Cedric Humes RB Virginia Tech 7a. David Pittman CB. Northwestern St 7b. Jeff King TE, Virginia Tech 660087[/snapback]
Jrock6986 Posted April 12, 2006 Author Posted April 12, 2006 Since you defined my mock as terrible, let me review yours; Bunkley & Stanley as defensive tackles over McCargo & Lewis. Not bad, same thought and same type of player. I prefer taking an OT higher and feel we get comparable value in using 2nd & 5th round picks at DT, however good thought. I prefer Justice over McNeil due to athletism, however both players could play LT as McNeil has great size/speed quickness ratio's. By using your #1 to trade down and get an extra pick, we get Bunkley and McNeil at 42. Totally acceptable. Anthony Smith vs Pat Watkins, prefer Watkins due to being bigger faster, and far more athletic and played against beter level of competition in a winning program, Syracuse is in a down conference and if a choice is available, prefer better athlete who played against better competition. Like the choice of Charles Spencer of Pitt at guard over my choice of Sims. However felt a greater need to get an OT so I could not trade down and Sims or Matua also played at power conferences and have comparable athletic talent. But I agree that the Bills do need a guard. We also agree that a defnesive tackle is needed, Anderson has a much higher upside then Rucker, who is more of a pass ruch specialist only, with limited run stop capability. Stovall is a luxury as we already have 9 WR's on the roster and is unnecessary. A running back is also needed and I prefer a guy like Robinson who also brings some additional skills to the table. At CB, I really like Devin Hester who has great skills for CB and will slip a bit in this draft. Tight End is not a position of need unless we take a Vernon Davis who I agree will be a special player, but with so many other needs is a luxary at this time. Now, don't you feel this is a better and more qualited response then yours. 660227[/snapback] I believe my mock hits all our needs at a time where we get the best value for the picki. Let me elaborate a little bit more in depth on your mock. Its terrible because we have 3 Qb's on our roster and we wont be adding another let alone 2. And your response on Stovall is totally off the board. We need a Stovall type of player for this offense because Sam Aiken is the only WR over 6' on the roster and hes not exactly a star let along a quality WR. Stovall would help this team on 3rd downs and in the end zone. Also Jeff King is a great red zone target who if there in the 7th round could maybe push Euhus for his spot.
BB2004 Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Keep this in your sig, cus when the draft happens I gaurantee the Bills don't draft a single player in your "mock" 660177[/snapback] 3a. Anthony Smith S Syracuse 3b. Charles Spencer G Pitt 3c. Maurive Stovall WR ND Any one of those guys could be drafted by the Bills.
bud8andbills Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Keep this in your sig, cus when the draft happens I gaurantee the Bills don't draft a single player in your "mock" 660177[/snapback] I second that opinion. Back to the old drawing board.
Recommended Posts