apuszczalowski Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5483276 Yeah Vince, maybe if they traded down you have a chance of going there
BuckeyeBill Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 I hope he drops to us, then we can trade our valuable pick and pick up a Bunkley-type player and get an additional pick.
JAMIEBUF12 Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 who cares we are not interested and we have more pressing needs than another qb
apuszczalowski Posted April 10, 2006 Author Posted April 10, 2006 who cares we are not interested and we have more pressing needs than another qb 657814[/snapback] Thats the entire reason I posted this, If you've seen the majority of my post, I am usually the one against Young (and Ngata) I just thought it was funny when I saw this article this morning and how many people want Buffalo to get him.
Ghost of BiB Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Thats the entire reason I posted this, If you've seen the majority of my post, I am usually the one against Young (and Ngata) I just thought it was funny when I saw this article this morning and how many people want Buffalo to get him. 657818[/snapback] Not always a popular view, here. But I'm a member of the trade down club, unless Davis is available and the Clements thing screws up and somehow forces a pick for Huff (assuming they are available).
R. Rich Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Not always a popular view, here. But I'm a member of the trade down club, unless Davis is available and the Clements thing screws up and somehow forces a pick for Huff (assuming they are available). 657833[/snapback] I like the idea of trading down too, if we can get a nice combination of picks in compensation.
Ghost of BiB Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 I like the idea of trading down too, if we can get a nice combination of picks in compensation. 657837[/snapback] Nothing I can really add that hasn't been said a hundred times, but looking at what the Bills need vs the depth in this years draft, and the "position" we might be paying number one money for, I can't see how one could miss. Assume only 25-50% of the picks actually pan out - isn't it better to have more to pick from?
R. Rich Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Nothing I can really add that hasn't been said a hundred times, but looking at what the Bills need vs the depth in this years draft, and the "position" we might be paying number one money for, I can't see how one could miss. Assume only 25-50% of the picks actually pan out - isn't it better to have more to pick from? 657845[/snapback] Yep. It's not the sexy pick, but this team needs a lot of talent, and we could do well in this draft by moving down a few spots and getting more draft picks.
Ghost of BiB Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Yep. It's not the sexy pick, but this team needs a lot of talent, and we could do well in this draft by moving down a few spots and getting more draft picks. 657851[/snapback] Guess we can be draft thread party-pooping pariahs together, Bubba.
R. Rich Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Guess we can be draft thread party-pooping pariahs together, Bubba. 657858[/snapback] Way ahead of you, Paul.
Ghost of BiB Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Way ahead of you, Paul. 657877[/snapback] We allowing girls in the clubhouse?
R. Rich Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 We allowing girls in the clubhouse? 657882[/snapback] Well, you did say clubhouse, didn't you?
Recommended Posts