major Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 I have always said, always, that I would never move the team from Buffalo. Now with this new collective bargaining agreement, I’m hopeful that I can steadfastly adhere to what I’ve said, but I’m making no promises,” said Wilson. This "no promises" line makes me wonder what Wilson is up to. Is he telling us that he's going to move the team to LA if he doesn't get what he wants from the league? Or is he just trying to get the sympathy vote from the NFL powers that be? Or, is he ready to sell? Whatever his motivation, his "no promises" makes me uneasy.
PromoTheRobot Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 I have always said, always, that I would never move the team from Buffalo. Now with this new collective bargaining agreement, I’m hopeful that I can steadfastly adhere to what I’ve said, but I’m making no promises,” said Wilson. This "no promises" line makes me wonder what Wilson is up to. Is he telling us that he's going to move the team to LA if he doesn't get what he wants from the league? Or is he just trying to get the sympathy vote from the NFL powers that be? Or, is he ready to sell? Whatever his motivation, his "no promises" makes me uneasy. 657298[/snapback] Whatever. He could have moved anytime in the last 10 years. Although I think the league wants to hand-pick their L.A. owner. No Bidwells, Irsays, Bensons, or for that matter, Wilsons! PTR
ans4e64 Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 i think he secretly means he cant promise us we will stay
Dan Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 i think he secretly means he cant promise us we will stay 657308[/snapback] I agree. That's how I interpret that comment.
mjjk73 Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 i think raplh will keep the team in buffalo but once he passes away the team will have to move with the new CBA the team will need money from somwhere and wont be part of revnue sharing and buffalo just doesnt have enough of it
Corp000085 Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 ok, i've stayed out of this long enough, but how does the team lose out on the shared revenue if wilson dies or sells the team??
Acantha Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 ok, i've stayed out of this long enough, but how does the team lose out on the shared revenue if wilson dies or sells the team?? 657448[/snapback] http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=44821
Coach Tuesday Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 He is threatening the League and New York State politicians, not Bills fans. And it seems to be working.
rockpile Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 i think raplh will keep the team in buffalo but once he passes away the team will have to move with the new CBA the team will need money from somwhere and wont be part of revnue sharing and buffalo just doesnt have enough of it 657347[/snapback] Bingo. The new CBA may exclude or penalize the Bills from revenue sharing NOW. The new CBA will now count money - like tax money raised to mantain the stadium - as revenue. That money would have to be shared with the other cities. On sale of the team, a new owner would not get revenue sharing for an undetermined period of time, and Buffalo ranks (I believe) 22nd in revenue. Simple math says a new owner would have to find a new city. Go to the TBD front page and read the news articles linked there. Listen to Friday's press conference when Marv compared what is happening in the NFL to the MBL.
obie_wan Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 Whatever. He could have moved anytime in the last 10 years. Although I think the league wants to hand-pick their L.A. owner. No Bidwells, Irsays, Bensons, or for that matter, Wilsons! PTR 657306[/snapback] Ideally the leageue will use the threat of moving to LA to extort new stadium deals for all teams that need them. Then, the league will somehow create another expansion team to put in LA thus generating another $1 billion to share with the existing owners.
Kelly the Dog Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 All Ralph has to do is make sure he dies in 2010 when there is zero estate tax.
nobody Posted April 10, 2006 Posted April 10, 2006 All Ralph has to do is make sure he dies in 2010 when there is zero estate tax. 657573[/snapback] Let's hope it doesn't have to turn into a Terri Schiavo type situation where Dan Snyder's and Jerry Jones' NFL are playing the part of the husband.
Recommended Posts