Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2006 Strength Of Schedule

 

Team Winning Percentage Opp. Total Wins Opp. Total Losses

 

Saints .566 145 111

Buccaneers .550 132 108

Giants .543 139 117

Bengals .543 139 117

Steelers .531 136 120

Titans .527 135 121

Chiefs .527 135 121

Texans .523 134 122

Ravens .523 134 122

Eagles .520 133 123

Redskins .516 132 124

Broncos .516 132 124

Raiders .516 132 124

Browns .512 131 125

Falcons .508 130 126

Rams .508 130 126

Panthers .504 129 127

Cowboys .504 129 127

Cardinals .500 128 128

Chargers .488 125 131

Colts .484 124 132

Jaguars .484 124 132

49ers .477 122 134

Bills .477 122 134

Lions .473 121 135

Patriots .473 121 135

Dolphins .469 120 136

Jets .465 119 137

Vikings .457 117 139

Seahawks .457 117 139

Packers .449 115 141

Bears .445 114 142

 

Looks like the whole AFC east indeed has it easy, bills the toughest of them all.

I hope we take it. Seahawks have it pretty easy. I have started to carve out the idea that the NFL knows the seahawks got screwed by the officials in SBXL so they are giving them a small push off, nudge type benefit.

Posted
...I have started to carve out the idea that the NFL knows the seahawks got screwed by the officials in SBXL so they are giving them a small push off, nudge type benefit.

655035[/snapback]

 

Huh? :)

The schedule is determined by a formula...it is predetermined & can't be modified by the NFL.

 

Shhhh, don't tell anyone but the Seahaks lost SBXL because they were not the best team. :P

Posted
Huh? :)

The schedule is determined by a formula...it is predetermined & can't be modified by the NFL.

 

Shhhh, don't tell anyone but the Seahaks lost SBXL because they were not the best team. :P

655040[/snapback]

Yes, especially since that would be stupid thing to say.

Posted
Yes, especially since that would be stupid thing to say.

655054[/snapback]

 

Really? You honestly think the Seahawks were robbed?

I thought they had a few bad calls against them but their play was not good at all.

Oh well, it's not like it was an important game or anything...like a Bills game :)

Posted
Really?  You honestly think the Seahawks were robbed?

I thought they had a few bad calls against them but their play was not good at all.

Oh well, it's not like it was an important game or anything...like a Bills game :)

655059[/snapback]

 

To say there was a "few bad calls" is like saying JFK died from an apparent head injury.

 

It just doesn't do it justice. :P

Posted

I think we have a very manageable schedule...The first few games will definatly set the tone. We've got to come out strong and violent. Hopefully knocking a few Pats players silly early in the contest...kinda like Lofa Tatupu's collision with Nick Goings in the playoffs last year.

 

I'm really looking forward to whipping the Bears and Packers...We better.

Posted

There is no way to determine the difficulty of our 2006 schedule because you're basing it on the way teams performed a year ago, and in most cases, with different personnel than we'll face this year.

 

Minnesota makes a major quarterback move and Brad Johnson has shown he can move the team down the field. Does San Diego figure to be a solid this year with Rivers as they'd been with Brees? It's a shame we don't play them sooner in the year.

 

The Jets have a new coach and you can count on Miami playing at a higher level this year than they did last year as well.

 

But measuring the strength of your schedule off old news helps people feel badly about their team and upcoming chances, so I won't interfere with anyone's desire to make themselves feel crappy.

Posted

Note that the Bills have the most difficult schedule in the AFC East. Why would that be? Because the Jests are playing the last-place schedule, and each of the two other teams get to play the Jests and Bills twice. I wish the Bills could play the Bills twice. Not fair. Doh!

×
×
  • Create New...