ICE Posted September 28, 2004 Author Posted September 28, 2004 What does "CSAS" mean? 48097[/snapback] sorry....OLD term...Chicken SH!$ Anonimity Crew.
Guffalo Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Now back to the subject at hand. I posted a thread to Mead. Not you, not anyone else. In the non cyber world if I hollered at Mead on the street and said I was gonna kick him in the nuts, would anyone interupt our conversation? Not unless he or she wanted a poke in the eye. It's called common courtasy, something long since gone on this board (see above). Bottom line I am through talking to you about this, it's not your thread, it isn't aimed at you. Nuff said. 48074[/snapback] Ok, so by posting a thread to Mead, you want only Mead, and no one else to read it. Couldn't it be done via the PM feature? Isn't that what it's for? I just walked in on this, but it seems like a lot of whining for nothing. Why post on a public board if the message is intended to be private?
CentralVaBills Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Actually Darin two things, I came to grip with my issues a long time ago. You are still there and this post confirms it. If we still had the old board up I guarentee you I quoted the same "I don't care, you dont matter, blah blah blah". It IS like looking into an old mirror reading your posts. Honestly that should give you some cause for concern. That said I'm putting you on ignore. I am here to talk football and can't do it when guys like you are taking a good football post sincerely meant to talk about the team and making it a personal attack thread. Get some help. Nuff said. Out. 48098[/snapback] What made you come back to the board AGAIN? How's the board you were going to start? How's that coming along? Just wondering. I can't imagine how that would go. I honestly would love to see how you'd run it.
ICE Posted September 28, 2004 Author Posted September 28, 2004 What made you come back to the board AGAIN? How's the board you were going to start? How's that coming along? Just wondering. I can't imagine how that would go. I honestly would love to see how you'd run it. 48116[/snapback] Since you meantion it...we (bills backers of Tulsa) ARE working on it. We already have the webspace and server available. I have had several regulars that were on this board and some still on this board waiting for it to come up. Some on BB.com as well. How will I run it, no more BS. The flaming will not happen. If you want to talk bills football then great. It's won't be a place for singleing others out and flaming. Now I know you are thinking it won't work....well this place keeps losing people and other boards keep gaining folks. Guess maybe it can work.
ICE Posted September 28, 2004 Author Posted September 28, 2004 Ok, so by posting a thread to Mead, you want only Mead, and no one else to read it. Couldn't it be done via the PM feature? Isn't that what it's for? I just walked in on this, but it seems like a lot of whining for nothing. Why post on a public board if the message is intended to be private? 48110[/snapback] this is OT but every time I see that damn avatar of yours, I keep thinking his name COULD Be guffalo LOL! Damn Six Flags commercial......
IBTG81 Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Since you meantion it...we (bills backers of Tulsa) ARE working on it. We already have the webspace and server available. I have had several regulars that were on this board and some still on this board waiting for it to come up. Some on BB.com as well. How will I run it, no more BS. The flaming will not happen. If you want to talk bills football then great. It's won't be a place for singleing others out and flaming. Now I know you are thinking it won't work....well this place keeps losing people and other boards keep gaining folks. Guess maybe it can work. 48121[/snapback] Who of "significance" has left? Oh yeah, no one.
DC Tom Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Well yes and no. If someone posts "Hey Tom" I respect that and don't mess with it. Common Curtasy but that is just me. 48090[/snapback] Common courtesy to not respond to a public statement that's meant to be private? And yet actually making a private statement public you don't find discourteous? Or, to take your earlier analogy, if you shouted across the street to someone that you were going to kick them in the nuts...where's the courtesy in that? Personally, I don't care either way. But you made a public statement in a public forum, and are not bitching about it and blaming everyone else because they don't respect your privacy. Nope, sorry. You wanted privacy, use PM. And that's precisely the same thing I'd say to someone who started a "Hey, DC Tom" thread and then whined that someone other than me responded. A public statement does not become private just because you "called it"...
ICE Posted September 28, 2004 Author Posted September 28, 2004 Who of "significance" has left? Oh yeah, no one. 48123[/snapback] In your oppinion.
Nervous Guy Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Common courtesy to not respond to a public statement that's meant to be private? And yet actually making a private statement public you don't find discourteous? Or, to take your earlier analogy, if you shouted across the street to someone that you were going to kick them in the nuts...where's the courtesy in that? Personally, I don't care either way. But you made a public statement in a public forum, and are not bitching about it and blaming everyone else because they don't respect your privacy. Nope, sorry. You wanted privacy, use PM. And that's precisely the same thing I'd say to someone who started a "Hey, DC Tom" thread and then whined that someone other than me responded. A public statement does not become private just because you "called it"... 48126[/snapback] I think we need a smilie that hits himself in the head with a hammer.
IBTG81 Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 In your oppinion. 48128[/snapback] I'm calling you on it. Name some names.
_BiB_ Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Common courtesy to not respond to a public statement that's meant to be private? And yet actually making a private statement public you don't find discourteous? Or, to take your earlier analogy, if you shouted across the street to someone that you were going to kick them in the nuts...where's the courtesy in that? Personally, I don't care either way. But you made a public statement in a public forum, and are not bitching about it and blaming everyone else because they don't respect your privacy. Nope, sorry. You wanted privacy, use PM. And that's precisely the same thing I'd say to someone who started a "Hey, DC Tom" thread and then whined that someone other than me responded. A public statement does not become private just because you "called it"... 48126[/snapback] I usually do a "Hey DC Tom" so everyone knows where to go to pick on you, but I'm an !@#$...
Alaska Darin Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Actually Darin two things, I came to grip with my issues a long time ago. You are still there and this post confirms it. If we still had the old board up I guarentee you I quoted the same "I don't care, you dont matter, blah blah blah". It IS like looking into an old mirror reading your posts. Honestly that should give you some cause for concern. That said I'm putting you on ignore. I am here to talk football and can't do it when guys like you are taking a good football post sincerely meant to talk about the team and making it a personal attack thread. Get some help. Nuff said. Out. 48098[/snapback] In answer to your 2 things: 1. Sure you did. 2. It's called consistancy. I'm not surprised you don't recognize it. You're here to talk football? What's the topic of this thread again? Who started it? Who brought up my name when I wasn't even involved in the thread? You putting me on ignore is one of the highest compliments you can pay. As for me being concerned about what you "think", good luck with that.
Berg Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 I'm calling you on it. Name some names. 48139[/snapback] I'm surprised at you, Ed. Don't you remember that ICE left? Like 100 times?
IBTG81 Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 I'm surprised at you, Ed. Don't you remember that ICE left? Like 100 times? 48191[/snapback] I forgot!
Last Guy on the Bench Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 I think we need a smilie that hits himself in the head with a hammer. 48135[/snapback] Now THAT actually did make me laugh out loud. I am not rolling on the floor, but I would if I were a little younger.
CentralVaBills Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 Since you meantion it...we (bills backers of Tulsa) ARE working on it. We already have the webspace and server available. I have had several regulars that were on this board and some still on this board waiting for it to come up. Some on BB.com as well. How will I run it, no more BS. The flaming will not happen. If you want to talk bills football then great. It's won't be a place for singleing others out and flaming. Now I know you are thinking it won't work....well this place keeps losing people and other boards keep gaining folks. Guess maybe it can work. 48121[/snapback] OK cool. So, out of curiousity, how would you handle your own post addressed to Mead about kicking him in the nuts? Although I have no problem with the post, it has nothing relevant about it pertaining to Bills football.
John from Riverside Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 You know.....I realize the topic of this post was humor.... But the thought of getting kicked in the nuts.......
_BiB_ Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 No I addressed his name only in the subject of the post. Therefore logic would dictate I am addressing him. Instead you feel the need to come onto a post that has nothing to do with you and flame my posting again. Further proof of how this board keeps going down hill. 48017[/snapback] I'm having a Deja Vu moment all over again.
nick in* england Posted October 7, 2004 Posted October 7, 2004 Who of "significance" has left? Oh yeah, no one. 48123[/snapback] there are 'significant' people here?? taxi!!!!!
Recommended Posts