The Dean Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 From his own web site's page on student evaluation: Student Evals of Pianka 650722[/snapback] I found this one particularly interesting: "Although I did not agree with all of the points made in your lectures concerning the coming of man's armageddon, I was glad to finally have a professor (and yes, you definitely professed) who held a pessimistic view of the world, whose thoughts weren't clouded by biotechnological advances and the almighty superiority of man. Many of Ehrlich's points, I believe, are incorrect and exaggerated, but fortunately, with your emphasis on literature, history and its importance, as well as good experimentation, I understand science better as a whole than ever before. Thank you for this experience." Sounds like a GREAT professor to me. If, as an academic, he is challenging his students and colleagues to think using controversial statements and opinions...good for him. If, he is trying, as a policy maker, to get this approach sanctioned (well...good fuc#ing luck, buddy)...then i can see some outrage. I don't get that sense, however. If I saw the transcript of the speach, perhaps I, too, would also be upset. Sounds like his colleagues enjoyed it, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts