Jump to content

Are you for or against abortion


gotsoccer22

Are you for or against abortion?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you for or against abortion?

    • yes
      14
    • no
      11


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, LeviF91 said:

 

Should have found one about swiftboating.  That would have been fun to re-live.

 

Or RCow's election prediction thread.  Still my all-time PPP favorite. 

 

Kerry by 15 points in PA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, /dev/null said:

digging up a thread from 2004 :blink:

 

Okay Tom.  Tibs has thrown down the gauntlet.  Go find us the classic threads about Retatta, speed of sound in space, or rolling 3.5 on a dice

 

The last two are long gone.  But retatta is still at the top of the baseball board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Just answer yes

 

Only gator would have a conversation with someone who hasn’t posted here in over 10 years. 

 

I was going through this and didn’t notice the date at first. I saw a reply for njsue and thought “oh no.....she’s back!!”  

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Only gator would have a conversation with someone who hasn’t posted here in over 10 years. 

 

I was going through this and didn’t notice the date at first. I saw a reply for njsue and thought “oh no.....she’s back!!”  

You too!

Actually, there is no PPP Archive. At the top of the frame you can navigate back some 300+ odd pages of this treasure chest of discourse, drivel, and prattle. Only a few are “archived” but in that context they are simply locked down from further comments. 

 

On on the main site’s index there are links to other Archives. There’s one listed for PPP, but it has no content... rather fitting, don’t you think? :P

Edited by Nanker
Veracity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question and answer choices make no sense.

 

Do you like dogs or cats? 1)Yes 2)No

 

Wtf?!

 

Also, I am pro-baby killing. The mothers should be forced to give birth before they decide that the baby is not of use. After birth, if the baby has no value, then it should be tossed off the Sparta cliff and left to exposure. 

 

 

Edited by Paulus
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paulus said:

The question and answer choices make no sense.

 

Do you like dogs or cats? 1)Yes 2)No

 

Wtf?!

 

Also, I am pro-baby killing. The mothers should be forced to give birth before they decide that the baby is not of use. After birth, if the baby has no value, then it should be tossed off the Sparta cliff and left to exposure. 

 

 

Bravo! You figured that out finally. Why go to the bother of throwing the babies off cliffs? Just leave them out for the wild dogs to eat. That can't be any more painful than having them be ripped from the womb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Bravo! You figured that out finally. Why go to the bother of throwing the babies off cliffs? Just leave them out for the wild dogs to eat. That can't be any more painful than having them be ripped from the womb.

Finally figured it out? 

 

Yeah, I was joking about the cliff thing. That would be murder. 

 

Useless and unwanted infants should be given a gun (butter knife for the Eurosexuals) and left to exposure. 

 

I mean seriously, babies are so stupid and useless. Can't even walk or use a gun.

Edited by Paulus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My profs in the 80s taught you should be able to kill children until they are at least two years old

 

I hope all the bad karma of the universe has hit them hard the last 30 years

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, row_33 said:

My profs in the 80s taught you should be able to kill children until they are at least two years old

 

I hope all the bad karma of the universe has hit them hard the last 30 years

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, I got one. What about retarded babies? The autism/retard tests are not certain, and comes back with a probability.  I'd be willing to bet that a significant number of abortions are based that, as this was what the baby doctor basically told us with regard to the autism/retard testing, when my son was still a fetus.

 

 You want to save the lives of normal healthy fetuses, then some form of infanticide may help. At least in the autism/retard abortion regard. 

 

What about harvesting fetuses for stem cells? That saves lives.

 

Can I just knock up tinder chicks and then sell fetuses for stem cells use? Is it legal? Do you think a 50/50 is asking too much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Yeah, I got one. What about retarded babies? The autism/retard tests are not certain, and comes back with a probability.  I'd be willing to bet that a significant number of abortions are based that, as this was what the baby doctor basically told us with regard to the autism/retard testing, when my son was still a fetus.

 

 You want to save the lives of normal healthy fetuses, then some form of infanticide may help. At least in the autism/retard abortion regard. 

 

What about harvesting fetuses for stem cells? That saves lives.

 

Can I just knock up tinder chicks and then sell fetuses for stem cells use? Is it legal? Do you think a 50/50 is asking too much?

 

Two coworkers have told me their mothers were told to abort because of an infinitesimal chance of a defect, and they were fine.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...