Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 for the last play of the game, if we were playing against the Pats, and we had the ball at the 5 yard line. Score is 24-28 and we need a touchdown to win the game and if we win were in the playoffs. I think the reason why Nall was signed is that Levy doesn't think Losman is the man at qb and Nall might be the better option. Also I don't think you can really trust Holcomb to be under center because has a journeyman. He hasn't started in many games over his career. I think that if this the case and if so I don't mind that. Lets break it down. We got a player who hasn't proved himself yet, a veteran journeyman, and guy who as played under one of the greatest Qb's who has ever played this game. I'll take Nall any day!
Nanker Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 I'll take Holcomb under the center wheel of a semi.
Art in PNS Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 Losman every time. No doubt in my mind until he PROVES it differently.
Mark VI Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 Root for the laundry. The names don't matter. They're nothing but cattle.
The Rev.Mattb74 ESQ. Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 "What the Hell is Brett Favre doing here"
Guest dog14787 Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 for the last play of the game, if we were playing against the Pats, and we had the ball at the 5 yard line. Score is 24-28 and we need a touchdown to win the game and if we win were in the playoffs. I think the reason why Nall was signed is that Levy doesn't think Losman is the man at qb and Nall might be the better option. Also I don't think you can really trust Holcomb to be under center because has a journeyman. He hasn't started in many games over his career. I think that if this the case and if so I don't mind that. Lets break it down. We got a player who hasn't proved himself yet, a veteran journeyman, and guy who as played under one of the greatest Qb's who has ever played this game. I'll take Nall any day! 641959[/snapback] YOUNG!!!!!!
DeLuca1967 Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 I'm more interested in who's playing center. We picked up a center from a line that gave up 54 sacks. For the record that's 11 more then the Bills gave up.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 Root for the laundry. The names don't matter. They're nothing but cattle. 641977[/snapback] Amen! I don't know if you are serious, but this is exactly what I think.
Billsfan from Germany Posted March 26, 2006 Posted March 26, 2006 for the last play of the game, if we were playing against the Pats, and we had the ball at the 5 yard line. Score is 24-28 and we need a touchdown to win the game and if we win were in the playoffs. I think the reason why Nall was signed is that Levy doesn't think Losman is the man at qb and Nall might be the better option. Also I don't think you can really trust Holcomb to be under center because has a journeyman. He hasn't started in many games over his career. I think that if this the case and if so I don't mind that. Lets break it down. We got a player who hasn't proved himself yet, a veteran journeyman, and guy who as played under one of the greatest Qb's who has ever played this game. I'll take Nall any day! 641959[/snapback] What about Craig Ochs? He played a very solid game on Saturday in NFL Europe: 12/15, 125 Yards, 1 TD, 0 INT over 2 Quarters
KRT88 Posted March 26, 2006 Posted March 26, 2006 Losman, I want him to take the job and show everyone he can play if given a chance.
mead107 Posted March 26, 2006 Posted March 26, 2006 for the last play of the game, if we were playing against the Pats, and we had the ball at the 5 yard line. Score is 24-28 and we need a touchdown to win the game and if we win were in the playoffs. I think the reason why Nall was signed is that Levy doesn't think Losman is the man at qb and Nall might be the better option. Also I don't think you can really trust Holcomb to be under center because has a journeyman. He hasn't started in many games over his career. I think that if this the case and if so I don't mind that. Lets break it down. We got a player who hasn't proved himself yet, a veteran journeyman, and guy who as played under one of the greatest Qb's who has ever played this game. I'll take Nall any day! 641959[/snapback] question for YOU . did you respond to one of the polls about who should be the QB the last few days ????????? read back a few days before asking the same sh-- hea d question . http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=43947
Mile High Posted March 26, 2006 Posted March 26, 2006 question for YOU . did you respond to one of the polls about who should be the QB the last few days ????????? read back a few days before asking the same sh-- head question . http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=43947 642762[/snapback] LOL! I was thinking the same thing... Good job Mead.
Tortured Soul Posted March 26, 2006 Posted March 26, 2006 We got a player who hasn't proved himself yet, a veteran journeyman, and guy who as played under one of the greatest Qb's who has ever played this game. I'll take Nall any day! 641959[/snapback] I think you're overvaluing the time Nall spent sitting on his butt. For example, if you backed up Johnny Unitas and Dan Marino, I still wouldn't want you anywhere near the Bills huddle. I'm also not sure how helpful Favre would be if he thought this guy was about for his job (which was probably not the case with Hasselback, et al).
Recommended Posts