Scraps Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Hostages rescued Pritchard told reporters he believed the hostages survived their ordeal because of their "commitment to peace and justice." Reflecting his group's opposition to the Iraq war, he suggested that the U.S.-led invasion and occupation was "the root case" of the abduction of the four men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Next time try the words "Thank You" No sh--, Scraps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I am appalled that we risked the lives of soldiers for these ungrateful scumbags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kegtapr Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Send them back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 The only thing missing that would make this completely surreal is someone complaining about their "abduction" by US forces... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 The only thing missing that would make this completely surreal is someone complaining about their "abduction" by US forces... 640201[/snapback] Charlie Sheen hasn't had time to chime in yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 is there anything in the article about how Tom Fox was a super hyper gung ho Pro-War advocate? no? i didn't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraps Posted March 23, 2006 Author Share Posted March 23, 2006 Charlie Sheen hasn't had time to chime in yet. 640210[/snapback] Charlie won't blame it on the invasion of Iraq. He'll tie it into the secret CIA plot that brought down the twin towers with radio controlled cargo planes that shoot missiles into building just before the planes crash into the buildings themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Charlie won't blame it on the invasion of Iraq. He'll tie it into the secret CIA plot that brought down the twin towers with radio controlled cargo planes that shoot missiles into building just before the planes crash into the buildings themselves. 640221[/snapback] Charlie's got more insight than the rest of us, though...his dad runs a fictitious White House on TV. Does anyone ever get the sense that the only thing keeping Charlie from being a member of the Church of Scientology is that they won't have him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Hostages rescued 639913[/snapback] Technically speaking that's not incorrrect - no invasion, no reason for them to be there, and no abduction. It was certainly a most ungracious and ungrateful statement though. Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Technically speaking that's not incorrrect - no invasion, no reason for them to be there, and no abduction. It was certainly a most ungracious and ungrateful statement though. Sheesh. 640407[/snapback] I thought you were going to sneak out to "see me". Liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Technically speaking that's not incorrrect - no invasion, no reason for them to be there, and no abduction. 640407[/snapback] Riiiiight. Because they had to be there after the invasion. I'm pretty sure this is the same group that showed up in Iraq before the invasion to serve as human shields for Saddam. But it's not like they're crazy or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraps Posted March 23, 2006 Author Share Posted March 23, 2006 Technically speaking that's not incorrrect - no invasion, no reason for them to be there, and no abduction. It was certainly a most ungracious and ungrateful statement though. Sheesh. 640407[/snapback] So if I develop a cocaine addiction can I blame Christopher Columbus? After all, if he hadn't discovered the New World, we wouldn't have all those coca plants being grown in South America or a vibrant drug smuggling industry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merovingian Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 It is not our job to make them happy. Our brave men and women in the military simply do what they know is right. It was right to free these ungrateful pigs, and I am sure that we would do it again. Afterall, their freedom to say stupid things and be ungrateful in the face of brave sacrifice is secured by the very people who delivered it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 It is not our job to make them happy. Our brave men and women in the military simply do what they know is right. 640646[/snapback] Don't they do what they are told? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 If we could have 10,000 of these peace clowns taken hostage in Iraq, think of how many insurgents that would tie up guarding them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 If we could have 10,000 of these peace clowns taken hostage in Iraq, think of how many insurgents that would tie up guarding them. 640794[/snapback] That's the best occupation plan I've heard in a while, actually... Which is pretty damned sad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Coli Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 That's the best occupation plan I've heard in a while, actually... Which is pretty damned sad... 640920[/snapback] Easy there, Monkey. It's a "liberation," not an "occupation." Freedom is on the march! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Easy there, Monkey. It's a "liberation," not an "occupation." Freedom is on the march! 641004[/snapback] It can be both. We occupied them to liberate them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts