BADOLBILZ Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 It is a shame Badol. I remember talking to you at RWS in October about Hutch becoming a UFA this year. I can't see any reason why the Bills didn't make him an offer. As for the possibility of him not wanting to play in Buffalo, I remember reading that he and his wife are from Florida. He DID sign an offer sheet from Minnesota, obviously not a huge market, nor a warm climate. The cap space was there, and so was the need. The Bills simply failed to act. The thing is, do we point the finger at Marv or Ralph? 635557[/snapback] Marv, Ralph, what's the difference? At some point management needs to realize they need to do something drastic with this OL. Fifteen years of trying to patchwork an OL together has not worked, it was time to make a move. It's not every year that you have the best players at two OL positions available in FA. Nobody needed it as badly as Buffalo. Not Cleveland, not Minnesota, nobody. Didn't get done. Now it's up to Marv to make chicken salad out of chicken sh*t.
Rico Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 It is a shame Badol. I remember talking to you at RWS in October about Hutch becoming a UFA this year. I can't see any reason why the Bills didn't make him an offer. As for the possibility of him not wanting to play in Buffalo, I remember reading that he and his wife are from Florida. He DID sign an offer sheet from Minnesota, obviously not a huge market, nor a warm climate. The cap space was there, and so was the need. The Bills simply failed to act. The thing is, do we point the finger at Marv or Ralph? 635557[/snapback] Not saying Marv would've gone after him cause I don't know, but I think it's another case like Bentley where they never had a chance, IMO he had cut a deal with the Vikings quite a while ago... you might as well also slam every other GM that had cap room available, or you can take your hat off to the Vikings.
Is Marv Awake? Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Ah, the old "i havent heard of them, therefore they must suck" arguement. 635473[/snapback] Ah. The even older " the old blah blah blah arguement" post. Prevents you from coming up with anything interesting to say.
Adam Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Ah. The even older " the old blah blah blah arguement" post. Prevents you from coming up with anything interesting to say. 635577[/snapback] And you think talking like you expect Mr. Levy to make this miraculous move, and win the Superbowl this yearis interesting? He's building, and being smart- this year is about weeding out the people he doesn't want. You don't just bring in players because you have money......Dallas will learn that harsh lesson this season
Is Marv Awake? Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 And you think talking like you expect Mr. Levy to make this miraculous move, and win the Superbowl this yearis interesting? He's building, and being smart- this year is about weeding out the people he doesn't want. You don't just bring in players because you have money......Dallas will learn that harsh lesson this season 635580[/snapback] I would be happy with just ONE move that made this team better.
Bill from NYC Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Not saying Marv would've gone after him cause I don't know, but I think it's another case like Bentley where they never had a chance, IMO he had cut a deal with the Vikings quite a while ago 635575[/snapback] Why would he do that? He is a member of a superbowl team, and the Vikes just traded away their quarterback. Do they have a running back as good as Alexander? I am thinking that almost all of these guys want the biggest contract. Admittedly, some might consider family matters, but their careers are short, so the need is there to sign for the big bucks. If the Bills need to overpay, so be it. The Bills needed to make a run at Hutch. Now, people are saying that there is a chance that we can get DaBrick. Can you imagine if we did both? People whine about keeping Moulds. One poster even insists that we pay him his full 06 salary. We don't need old, malcontent stiffs. We need young football players who are capable of blocking other humans, and until we get them, we are simply going to keep on losing. Period.
Adam Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 I am thinking that almost all of these guys want the biggest contract. Admittedly, some might consider family matters, but their careers are short, so the need is there to sign for the big bucks. If the Bills need to overpay, so be it. 635592[/snapback] Thats neither Mr. Levy's decision, nor yours.
Rico Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Why would he do that? He is a member of a superbowl team, and the Vikes just traded away their quarterback. Do they have a running back as good as Alexander? I am thinking that almost all of these guys want the biggest contract. Admittedly, some might consider family matters, but their careers are short, so the need is there to sign for the big bucks. If the Bills need to overpay, so be it. 635592[/snapback] I hear ya, but the best way to get the biggest contract is to visit several teams, play them against each other & against your old team, & sign with the team that will give you the most jack. And for whatever reason(s), that didn't happen with Hutch, he signed with the Vikings the very first day that he could without visiting anyone else.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Wells is a perfect example of what I am talking about. If AZ matches, these so-called fans will say that Wells was great and we should have paid more for him. If AZ does not match, these so-called fans will say that AZ knows something we don't about Wells, and we clearly paid to much. 635325[/snapback] Wow, are you always this much of an arrogant ass? I for one don't think this scrub is the answer to our OL woes, but that's just me. They didn't even try to pick up a pro bowl center. Wells? Give me a fuggen break. Take a look at the moves Miami's made. There's a team serius about winning.
Acantha Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Thanks for letting me know when I can complain, I wasn't sure when Marv's freshness date was up. You are quite a trooper being willing to give Marv another 4 years without addressing a nearly 15 year old weakness. My guess is most of the Marv apologists will be sticking "For Sale" signs in Jaurons yard long before that. 635513[/snapback] You may (and regularly do) complain as much as you want. But in your post you say that they haven't gone after top Oline talent in years. Marv just got here. He has to have more than weeks to do something. And no, I don't expect him to do nothing over the next 4 years. I expect changes. But there is a big difference between 4 years (or the two that I "expect" it to take to clean some stuff up) and what he has so far had.
Acantha Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 The cap space was there, and so was the need. The Bills simply failed to act. The thing is, do we point the finger at Marv or Ralph? 635557[/snapback] The Hutch deal is said to be for 13mil in the first year, and now Seattle is thinking about actaully signing. Do you think it would have been wise to offer that much? I do not. With all the holes I can't see anyone being worth that much money.
Gambler Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Thats neither Mr. Levy's decision, nor yours. 635593[/snapback] It kind of reminds me of the good ol' days when the faithful used to say, " I trust Mike Mularkey, I trust Jerry Gray, I trust Ralph Wilson, I trust Tom Donahoe, the fans are idiots...." Now it's, "I trust Marv." I hope Marv succeeds beyond everyone's wild imagination, but you have to be a wild eyed optimist to see how the team has improved it's competitive position vs. Miami and New England in the AFC East.
gggbills Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Wow, are you always this much of an arrogant ass? I for one don't think this scrub is the answer to our OL woes, but that's just me. They didn't even try to pick up a pro bowl center. Wells? Give me a fuggen break. Take a look at the moves Miami's made. There's a team serius about winning. 635600[/snapback] Do you always call people names when you do not like their post. The fact that you have to do such things pretty much tells me all I need to know about you. How do you know they did not try to pick up a pro bowl center? the fact that they did not pick up one does not mean they did not try. Or perhaps you have some inside information you would like to share with the rest of us. Perhaps you work at OBD and and have first hand knowledge of what the Bills tried and did not try to do. Take note of this post. I do not argree with what you wrote, but I did not call you any foul names. I have found that people with an avg. I.Q. or above can refrain from such behavior. However, if you find that you can not control yourself, try this......attack the post, not the poster.
Bill from NYC Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 The Hutch deal is said to be for 13mil in the first year, and now Seattle is thinking about actaully signing. Do you think it would have been wise to offer that much?I do not. With all the holes I can't see anyone being worth that much money. 635603[/snapback] Of course it would have been wise. The man is as good as any guard in the NFL, and is younger than most top guards.The contract WAS excessive, but in 3 or 4 years it won't look as bad as the cap keeps rising. I really do understand your point about the Bills having other holes, but we pick often and early in April, and there is 5 mil cap space sitting around whining with his "advisors."
Nanker Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Ah, the old "i havent heard of them, therefore they must suck" arguement. 635473[/snapback] Which of course, is the other side of the "their team didn't want to re-sign them, so they must suck dregs, which is why Marv and Ralph were able to sign them for the price of a toe jam sandwich" argument.
cåblelady Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Do you always call people names when you do not like their post. 635701[/snapback] I call you Sweetie......even when you stand me up at games.
ACor58 Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Before some of you jump on this post and say..."The Cardinals / Bears haven't matached yet" hear me out. I am not advocating that we overpay for players, unless the front office sees a tremendous amount of upside in any potential player. However, that last two attempts to sign RFAs seem like all we did was do these two guys a favor, since neither had been reported to go on any other FA visits. It was widely known that the Cardinals were going to match any reasonable offer that they Bills made for Wells and reports out of Chicago indicated the same for Idonije. The deals that Marv and Co. put together were nothing more than market value, with relatively low signing bonuses, and probably didn't do much to prevent their prospective teams from matching. So if that is the case, why bother doing it? Are they trying to send a message to the fans saying "Hey look at us, we are active in FA." Maybe the front office didn't see much potential in these guys, I don't know. But if you are going to make an effort to sign these guys go ahead and make a strong effort. Don't just dick around and pretend like you are trying to sign these guys. I hope that I am wrong amd we sign both, but the reports out of Phoenix and Chicago have both teams leaning towards matching.
Max Fischer Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 See below for half dozen threads on this topic.
Like A Mofo Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Marv is a bafoon with zero credentials...he sucks...fire him, fire Jauron...fire everyone...you mean you did not receive the memo from Is Marv Awake?
gggbills Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 I call you Sweetie......even when you stand me up at games. 635792[/snapback] WOW!!! You just made my day cablelady
Recommended Posts