Ghost of BiB Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 NSS Wish we could close out Iraq pretty soon so we could ramp up for Iran. Gonna be a lot tougher, not in the least because we have shown we are willing to sh-- on whatever friends we have there. Congress should have read this before they decided to pass judgement. They may not like it, but it is the NSS. Not worth much if everyone doesn't play nice inside the beltway.
Mickey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 NSS Wish we could close out Iraq pretty soon so we could ramp up for Iran. Gonna be a lot tougher, not in the least because we have shown we are willing to sh-- on whatever friends we have there. Congress should have read this before they decided to pass judgement. They may not like it, but it is the NSS. Not worth much if everyone doesn't play nice inside the beltway. 631719[/snapback] What friends in Iraq have we sh-- on?
kegtapr Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 What friends in Iraq have we sh-- on? 631852[/snapback] There was that sheep farmer down by the river.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 There was that sheep farmer down by the river. 631867[/snapback] BiB was that you? I like this list of problems and their descriptions, especially the Cesar Chavez shot: # In Venezuela, a demagogue awash in oil money is undermining democracy and seeking to destabilize the region. Hmm, one finger pointed out and four back at yourself. Who wrote this puff piece. The words sound like they came out of one of those reality shows or Enron's pre-crash prospetus.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 NSS Wish we could close out Iraq pretty soon so we could ramp up for Iran. Gonna be a lot tougher, not in the least because we have shown we are willing to sh-- on whatever friends we have there. Congress should have read this before they decided to pass judgement. They may not like it, but it is the NSS. Not worth much if everyone doesn't play nice inside the beltway. 631719[/snapback] "Champion Aspirations for Human Dignity"? What the !@#$ is that doing in the National Security Strategy? That may even exceed a Clinton level of stupidity. And that's even above and beyond that they're not championing human dignity, just aspirations.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 "Champion Aspirations for Human Dignity"? What the !@#$ is that doing in the National Security Strategy? That may even exceed a Clinton level of stupidity. And that's even above and beyond that they're not championing human dignity, just aspirations. 631975[/snapback] Yeh, I was LOL on that one....including: Numerous remaining regional challenges demand the world’s attention: These are the ones we will ignore them anyway:
KD in CA Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 Don't bother me with this crap....mid term elections are less than 8 months away.
Mickey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 I like this part: How We Will Advance Freedom: Principled in Goals and Pragmatic in Means Speaking out against abuses of human rights I think they really meant: "Speaking out against [those who are critical of us for our own] abuses of human rights"
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 "Expand the Circle of Development by Opening Societies and Building the Infrastructure of Democracy" Expand the circle of development? What is that, a kindergarten class for nation-states? I also like the substance of "Work with Others to Defuse Regional Conflicts": 1. Conflict Prevention and Resolution...2. Conflict Intervention... 3. Post-Conflict Stabilization and Reconstruction... 4. Genocide... Genocide? Nice headings. Basically says "We'll work to keep fights from starting, inteverne when they start, rebuild when they're over, and kill everyone who gets in the way." What, they couldn't say "Genocide Prevention" or something? Jesus Christ, these idiots SUCK at marketing?
Johnny Coli Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 The Administration has worked with Congress to adopt and implement key reforms like the Patriot Act which promote our security while also protecting our fundamental liberties.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 632083[/snapback] Yeh, but that isn't even funny. That just pisses me off, where is your avatar when I need it.
Johnny Coli Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 Yeh, but that isn't even funny. That just pisses me off, where is your avatar when I need it. 632099[/snapback] They hate us for our freedoms, so if we don't have any, maybe they'll leave us alone.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 They hate us for our freedoms, so if we don't have any, maybe they'll leave us alone. 632102[/snapback] I've heard more senseless strategies. I mean, I'm not advocating it...but I've heard stupider.
Mickey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 "Expand the Circle of Development by Opening Societies and Building the Infrastructure of Democracy" Expand the circle of development? What is that, a kindergarten class for nation-states? I also like the substance of "Work with Others to Defuse Regional Conflicts": Genocide? Nice headings. Basically says "We'll work to keep fights from starting, inteverne when they start, rebuild when they're over, and kill everyone who gets in the way." What, they couldn't say "Genocide Prevention" or something? Jesus Christ, these idiots SUCK at marketing? 632052[/snapback] Not to quibble but I don't think their execution is so good either.
Mickey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 632083[/snapback] Well, remember, when they are talking about the Patriot Act and surveillance, they are talking about getting a warrant.
Mickey Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 They hate us for our freedoms, so if we don't have any, maybe they'll leave us alone. 632102[/snapback] Brilliant strategy.
Ghost of BiB Posted March 16, 2006 Author Posted March 16, 2006 I'm disappointed. But as Tom says, they suck at marketing. I was always big on not specifying people, lock yourself in that way. But, now everything has to be TV. If one is going to soundbite, do it effectively. I'm through with it anyway. Time to go back to cleaning dirty dirt. My old boss has something in Rouen, France. Drink cognac, eat good food. I'm not living much longer, anyway. Might as well have fun.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 I'm disappointed. But as Tom says, they suck at marketing. I was always big on not specifying people, lock yourself in that way. But, now everything has to be TV. If one is going to soundbite, do it effectively. I'm through with it anyway. Time to go back to cleaning dirty dirt. My old boss has something in Rouen, France. Drink cognac, eat good food. I'm not living much longer, anyway. Might as well have fun. 632261[/snapback] I thought you were looking at Costa Rica? Great surfin there and lots of young women!
bobblehead Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 If the gov was just a bit more timely on the release of this, we might have had a chance to defeat Christmas.
Ghost of BiB Posted March 16, 2006 Author Posted March 16, 2006 I like this part: How We Will Advance Freedom: Principled in Goals and Pragmatic in Means Speaking out against abuses of human rights I think they really meant: "Speaking out against [those who are critical of us for our own] abuses of human rights" 632027[/snapback] Don't gloat too hard. This is still much better than not having one at all. Where have your rights been abused?
Recommended Posts