X. Benedict Posted March 14, 2006 Posted March 14, 2006 Pat Robertson watch: BBC Link:Rev. Robertson Speaks Again
Ghost of BiB Posted March 14, 2006 Posted March 14, 2006 Pat Robertson watch: BBC Link:Rev. Robertson Speaks Again 629325[/snapback] It means he's old, and probably more than a little artery hardened.
OnTheRocks Posted March 14, 2006 Posted March 14, 2006 'Crazed fanatics' takes one to know one i suppose.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 14, 2006 Posted March 14, 2006 Pat Robertson watch: BBC Link:Rev. Robertson Speaks Again 629325[/snapback] On the one hand, I tend to dismiss Robertson as a fanatic who represents his own narrow viewpoint the vast majority of us don't share and recognize is whacked. On the other hand, we tend to accept as representative of Islam those whose narrow viewpoint the vast majority of Muslims don't share and recognize is whacked. Pat, want to take a wild guess at how you're making us normal Americans look in the world's eyes?
Ghost of BiB Posted March 14, 2006 Posted March 14, 2006 On the one hand, I tend to dismiss Robertson as a fanatic who represents his own narrow viewpoint the vast majority of us don't share and recognize is whacked. On the other hand, we tend to accept as representative of Islam those whose narrow viewpoint the vast majority of Muslims don't share and recognize is whacked. Pat, want to take a wild guess at how you're making us normal Americans look in the world's eyes? 629432[/snapback] Why bother. We have Congress. (Thanks for the lead line)
Old German Woman Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Well said. On the one hand, I tend to dismiss Robertson as a fanatic who represents his own narrow viewpoint the vast majority of us don't share and recognize is whacked. On the other hand, we tend to accept as representative of Islam those whose narrow viewpoint the vast majority of Muslims don't share and recognize is whacked. Pat, want to take a wild guess at how you're making us normal Americans look in the world's eyes? 629432[/snapback]
/dev/null Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Pat Robertson is to the left what Cindy Sheehan is to the right. Everytime they open their mouth and prove what 'tards they are, someone has to point it out and give them the attention they crave. Maybe if you just ignore them, nobody would notice them
RkFast Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Pat Robertson is to the left what Cindy Sheehan is to the right. Everytime they open their mouth and prove what 'tards they are, someone has to point it out and give them the attention they crave. Maybe if you just ignore them, nobody would notice them 635465[/snapback] Not to defend Robertson, but the next time Pat Robertson rubs elbows with some of America's arch enemies like Sheehan does, it will be his first. They are NOT in the same boat. Sheehan's worse.
Wacka Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 I see the Lame Stream Media bringing her up., not Fox.
Johnny Coli Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Not to defend Robertson, but the next time Pat Robertson rubs elbows with some of America's arch enemies like Sheehan does, it will be his first. They are NOT in the same boat. Sheehan's worse. 635722[/snapback] Pat Robertson has a TV show. Cindy Sheehan would have dissappeared long ago were it not for the FOX news and Drudge infatuation with her. I hardly see how Robertson with a satellite for a pulpit is less dangerous than a crazy woman who has to beg to get arrested.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Not to defend Robertson, but the next time Pat Robertson rubs elbows with some of America's arch enemies like Sheehan does, it will be his first. They are NOT in the same boat. Sheehan's worse. 635722[/snapback] Arch enemies like...Jesse Jackson? I understand the use of hyperbole in making a point...but come on now...
RuntheDamnBall Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Arch enemies like...Jesse Jackson? I understand the use of hyperbole in making a point...but come on now... 635939[/snapback] You must have missed the post that detailed how the Rev. Jackson picked up a raygun, and he's not afraid to use it for the people.
KRC Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Arch enemies like...Jesse Jackson? I understand the use of hyperbole in making a point...but come on now... 635939[/snapback] I am guessing he meant Chavez.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 I am guessing he meant Chavez. 635947[/snapback] Chavez is an arch enemy? Why? Because he's a noisy socialist?
Ghost of BiB Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Chavez is an arch enemy? Why? Because he's a noisy socialist? 635958[/snapback] With oil.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 With oil. 635963[/snapback] Does that make him more or less dangerous than Dubai Ports World?
Ghost of BiB Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Does that make him more or less dangerous than Dubai Ports World? 635965[/snapback] I don't pay any attention to Sheehan, had no idea she was photo opping or whatever with Chavez. That tells me more about him than it does her. Maybe not a real bright move on his part.
KRC Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Chavez is an arch enemy? Why? Because he's a noisy socialist? 635958[/snapback] I didn't say it was a valid point, I am just mentioning who I think he was referring to in his post.
RkFast Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 I didn't say it was a valid point, I am just mentioning who I think he was referring to in his post. 635980[/snapback] Way to nitpick, guys. Chevez is not an enemy of the U.S.? Sheehan has also met with leaders of the Communist Party and other groups who are an Anti-US as one can get.
X. Benedict Posted March 20, 2006 Author Posted March 20, 2006 Way to nitpick, guys. Chevez is not an enemy of the U.S.? Sheehan has also met with leaders of the Communist Party and other groups who are an Anti-US as one can get. 636024[/snapback] How does meeting with them make her dangerous?
Recommended Posts