Hardy Pyle Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 ...because over the past 3 -5 years it seems like just about every signing the Bills made that the fans were salivating over turned out to be a dissapointment. Marv, keep bringing in the ground troops. I'd much rather see us build a team like NE than go after big name signings. I personally, don't know if these are good signings or bad, but the fact that most fans disagree with them is a good sign to me. adios!
Stl Bills Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 Yeah didn't they have to shut down the board when we brought in Gandy and Fat Bennie last year? Everyone was ecstatic about those signings
Risin Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 Yeah didn't they have to shut down the board when we brought in Gandy and Fat Bennie last year? Everyone was ecstatic about those signings 624895[/snapback] Didn't take long to blow a hole in that theory.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 Didn't take long to blow a hole in that theory. ?
Mark Vader Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 Hardy Pyle Posted Today, 07:48 PM ...because over the past 3 -5 years it seems like just about every signing the Bills made that the fans were salivating over turned out to be a dissapointment. I would'nt go that far. When we signed players like London Fletcher, Sam Adams and Takeo Spikes, we all salivated, and those players turned out to be quite productive.
jahnyc Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 I have no problems with the signings, unless the Bills overpaid or Triplett is the only addition at DT.
jarthur31 Posted March 12, 2006 Posted March 12, 2006 Marv isn't done yet people! But I like our 2 newest Bills.
Hardy Pyle Posted March 12, 2006 Author Posted March 12, 2006 I have no problems with Gandy. Adams....I wouldn't call that a success. Fletcher...not everyone liked him...turned out pretty good. Spikes....everyone liked him, and he turned out pretty good.
Recommended Posts