dundy249 Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Information from OBD had been obtained in reference to the Eric Moulds situtation. Moulds and Bills Management have come to an agreement..I do not have the terms as of yet but there will be an announcment by weeks end. As I get the terms I will pass them along. 615603[/snapback] Maybe he reached an agreement with Mike Sherman?
Thailog80 Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Soprano has been 100%....100% WRONG! PTR 615633[/snapback] TBD's Nostradamus
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 I don't know it could be the other cuts were made to free up enough money to keep EM. So he could get lucky on this one.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 You will all see..and you will all feel shame. 615626[/snapback] Now see...ludicrous or not, you were at least holding yourself up with a measure of respectability. Then you had to go and post this. Now I have no choice but to laugh in your general direction.
SOPRANO 3695 Posted March 1, 2006 Author Posted March 1, 2006 i know i'll see that he will stay, because he probably will!!! why dont you start a new thread talking about your inside sources saying that the bills will draft either nagata, davis, or huff. then we'll all see then too 615632[/snapback] I wouldn't post something that I have no information on. That is wrong and misleading. I am simply letting the general public know what my sources tell me who are "deep within" SDS: If you would like me to take my information elsewhere please inform me and I will be glad to do so.
Thailog80 Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 I wouldn't post something that I have no information on. That is wrong and misleading. I am simply letting the general public know what my sources tell me who are "deep within" SDS: If you would like me to take my information elsewhere please inform me and I will be glad to do so. 615642[/snapback] Why does only Scott get that option?
cåblelady Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Why does only Scott get that option? 615646[/snapback] ....'cause he only has 2 babies.
nfreeman Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 I wouldn't post something that I have no information on. That is wrong and misleading. I am simply letting the general public know what my sources tell me who are "deep within" SDS: If you would like me to take my information elsewhere please inform me and I will be glad to do so. 615642[/snapback] Soprano -- please keep posting. I enjoy it and for that matter I do believe you have a source. Any info on specific terms of the deal? Also -- any info on whether we are going to bring in another QB? Go Bills.
todd Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Prick. Information from OBD had been obtained in reference to the Eric Moulds situtation. Moulds and Bills Management have come to an agreement..I do not have the terms as of yet but there will be an announcment by weeks end. As I get the terms I will pass them along. 615603[/snapback]
toeknee24 Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Information from OBD had been obtained in reference to the Eric Moulds situtation. Moulds and Bills Management have come to an agreement..I do not have the terms as of yet but there will be an announcment by weeks end. As I get the terms I will pass them along. 615603[/snapback] Hey Soprano who is Sherman bringing in as assistant coaches you Jackass?
slothrop Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 I wouldn't post something that I have no information on. That is wrong and misleading. I am simply letting the general public know what my sources tell me who are "deep within" SDS: If you would like me to take my information elsewhere please inform me and I will be glad to do so. 615642[/snapback] You seem surprised that people do not believe you - that makes me agree with Crap THrowing Monkey (ack!) that you have mental issues. LEts look at the facts: 1) you were wrong about Mike Sherman as HC; 2) you were wrong about Mike Sherman as OC; 3) you were wrong about Jim Bates as DC; 4) you were right about nothing. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that you are wrong about EM. Considering you considerable credibility gap with TBD I would suggest that you give hints as to your source or say where in the organization he/she works; or tell us outright. Even if EM does come to an agreement with the Bills, given the facts listed above, your "correct prediction" is more likely the product of probability (law of large numbers) than it is inside information you have garnered from your "source."
OGTEleven Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Dude, while I truly respect and admire your dedication, courage, and even comportment in insisting on making these predictions in the face of adversity that is quite honestly largely of your own making...I also can't help but wonder if it's a sign of some deeper disturbances for which you might consider seeking help... 615625[/snapback] I wasn't even going to click on this thread. At first I wished I hadn't. Then, from out of the blue, CTM starts his reply with the word "Dude". Now I know that in life, anything is possible.
gobillsinytown Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Soprano: What does your source say about the CBA? Because if that doesn't get done, nothing else is going to matter much......
sven233 Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 My sources tell me that there truly has been an agreement met between the Bills and Moulds. The Bills have agreed to give Moulds an appreciation dinner at McDonald's before they kick him out the door. That said, thanks for everything, Eric!
The Senator Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 Information from OBD had been obtained in reference to the Eric Moulds situtation. Moulds and Bills Management have come to an agreement..I do not have the terms as of yet but there will be an announcment by weeks end. As I get the terms I will pass them along. 615603[/snapback] Too funny!
sfladave Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 You will all see..and you will all feel shame. 615626[/snapback] Feel shame????? For what? Not falling hook, line and sinker for another bold, "I have a deep throat source who told me....", line of speculation? Never trade on inside information...it will just come back to bite you in the ass, or in your deep throats case, make you gag!
slothrop Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 Soprano: What does your source say about the CBA? Because if that doesn't get done, nothing else is going to matter much...... 615664[/snapback] Ugh!
seq004 Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 You will all see..and you will all feel shame. 615626[/snapback] Yeah, like we felt the shame when Sherman was hired.
ans4e64 Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 ok guys i think he knows how we feel, enough with the bashing lol damn.
yall Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 For f*cks sake not again. Is it necesary to waste so much time flaming someone for making a prediction on a message board? So what if he is lying through his teeth or not. Why people get so worked up is beyond me. How often does ESPN or SI report that their sources within such-and-such state 'X' and then a week later the reality is revealed as 'Y'? They are the supposed professionals, and through advertising, we pay for their services (in a roundabout way). Does everyone flip out when they f up?
Recommended Posts