Thailog80 Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 I'd sign him if Holcomb wins the starting QB job...then we would not only have a replacement for Clements, we could let him play two-way and also have a #1 receiver to replace Moulds... 604701[/snapback]
Stussy109 Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 Umm, why would we spend top dollar on an older guy? don't get my wrong I like Law, but wouldnt it make more sense to just pay clements. winfield broke my heart when he left, I wish they would just pay nate. 604670[/snapback] Nate will be a bill for another 5 years. Just my prediction, there is no way he walks, Unless there is an offer too good to refuse.
Beerball Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 Deficient? I wouldn't say that. 604678[/snapback] I believe you did say that.
ACor58 Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 Like I said earlier, he wants to stick it to the Pats... Ty Law said he expects the Jets to release him shortly, and that he wants to play for a Super Bowl contender. In an interview with the Kansas City Star, the Pro Bowl cornerback said the Dolphins fit that description. -- Newsday
jarthur31 Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2332389 If Clements goes, since ty law is a free agent, and him and milloy get along, we will need a veteran presence. He probably will demand a big contract i dont know, but would you be happy if the bills signed law? 604570[/snapback] I'd rather have Nate because he is younger and has more upside. Ty is no longer a young pup. Milloy is also showing his age.
BillsWatch Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2332389 If Clements goes, since ty law is a free agent, and him and milloy get along, we will need a veteran presence. He probably will demand a big contract i dont know, but would you be happy if the bills signed law? 604570[/snapback] I'd be very unhappy. Milloy is far over paid and we do not need another older, overpaid player.
Pyrite Gal Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2332389 If Clements goes, since ty law is a free agent, and him and milloy get along, we will need a veteran presence. He probably will demand a big contract i dont know, but would you be happy if the bills signed law? 604570[/snapback] I think NC is tagged and stays here. Leverage dictates if he wants the dollars he will have to sign for far less than he would have gotten last year after a Pro Bowl season, but thats life and even at a lower amount it is far more money than he has ever seen and will be set for life. It actually might be best for the Bills if he actually refused to negotiate and played under the tag. We can afford it with the cap going up and he will play next year like it was a contract year because it will be.
Beerball Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 I think NC is tagged and stays here. Leverage dictates if he wants the dollars he will have to sign for far less than he would have gotten last year after a Pro Bowl season, but thats life and even at a lower amount it is far more money than he has ever seen and will be set for life. It actually might be best for the Bills if he actually refused to negotiate and played under the tag. We can afford it with the cap going up and he will play next year like it was a contract year because it will be. 605448[/snapback] Far too much sense for a first post! Why the name?
stuckincincy Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 And then draft Ngata in the first round? 605601[/snapback] I see you've discovered a technicality in the new, move collegians rule. Very good!
Beerball Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 I see you've discovered a technicality in the new, move collegians rule. Very good! 605608[/snapback] Just playing around on a slow Friday. Gotta keep the all pro admin team on their toes.
Like A Mofo Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 No. We already have 2 good corners. 605773[/snapback] No. Nate is a BUM...didn't you get the memo?
Beerball Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 No. Nate is a BUM...didn't you get the memo? 605778[/snapback] Bet if your name was Spikes22 you would be singing a different tune.
stuckincincy Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 No. We already have 2 good corners. 605773[/snapback] Sure are. They were key factors in the successful 5 - 11 season.
Orton's Arm Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 Far too much sense for a first post! Why the name? 605519[/snapback] If you knew the name, you'd be saying it was far too short for a first post. Let me give you a clue. Not a real clue, but a FAKE clue. A big FAT clue. A clue that will give you a SUNNY disposition.
JAMIEBUF12 Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Really? I thought I read on this site that he was a free agent... No need to be a dick pal. 604683[/snapback] he is a free agent who is getting a "franchise tag slapped on him" in other words nate aint going anywhere............no team is giving us 2 #1 draft picks for him and we wont find a sucker like atlanta when we robbed them in the peerless price trade.nate will be a bill for at least another season....if he plays well we will franchise him again next season.
Toledo Bill Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Ralph's money would be better invested in either the offensive or defensive line. As far as Milloy, I always liked him as a player but he can't stay with anyone in coverage anymore. Time to go...
Beerball Posted February 21, 2006 Posted February 21, 2006 If you knew the name, you'd be saying it was far too short for a first post. Let me give you a clue. Not a real clue, but a FAKE clue. A big FAT clue. A clue that will give you a SUNNY disposition. 606038[/snapback] That's what I was thinking, must have missed the memo. The new name is catchy.
Recommended Posts