Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Whistle blowers 603989[/snapback] Who cares? Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident...
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Who cares? Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident... 603993[/snapback] Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident!?!? Why the hell didn't the media report this?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident!?!? Why the hell didn't the media report this? 604002[/snapback] Because they're too busy reporting that they didn't report Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident. And now that Cheney's being interviewed on Fox, we'll never know the truth behind what happened...
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 And now that Cheney's being interviewed on Fox, we'll never know the truth behind what happened... 604007[/snapback] Friggin' ball-washers. Mega-news like this (you know, things with global implications), should not be addressed on Fox. This is at least an MSNBC thingy. Maybe even CNN.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Friggin' ball-washers. Mega-news like this (you know, things with global implications), should not be addressed on Fox. This is at least an MSNBC thingy. Maybe even CNN. 604026[/snapback] Although it's not TRULY important until the Sacramento Bee picks it up...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Who cares? Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident... 603993[/snapback] Correction a 24 hour later now sober Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident...after a few too many nips off a flask... Whistleblowers does not suprise me, I hear there is a lot more to come out from friend in the know, it will continue and endless trick throughout the rest of this administration as more loyal soldiers become disinchanted with the B.S. lies they are subject to. It is not going away.
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Correction a 24 hour later now sober Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident...after a few too many nips off a flask... 604031[/snapback] You personally did a BAC test on Cheney? What was his BAC level at the time of the accident?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Correction a 24 hour later now sober Cheney shot a guy in a hunting accident...after a few too many nips off a flask... 604031[/snapback] I've heard plenty of people now SAY he was drunk. I haven't yet seen anyone provide evidence of that, though. Just say it. And don't tell me to prove he wasn't. You're making the accusation, burden of proof is on you. And don't tell me they delayed in reporting the incident. They delayed in reporting it to the press. Everything I've seen so far says it was reported to the proper law enforcement authorities and emergencies immediately. Maybe you should pick up the police report and give it a once-over first...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 What was his BAC level at the time of the accident? 604036[/snapback] No one knows, because the accident wasn't reported to the media for 24 hours. And, as we all know, the police and EMS, who were on the scene, aren't qualified to make that judgement. Just the media. Who couldn't even bother to listen for the call on a friggin' police scanner...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 You personally did a BAC test on Cheney? What was his BAC level at the time of the accident? 604036[/snapback] Oh common, you believe that crap, why wait 24 hours? Don't need one, this is not a ciminal court, this is a civil trial, circumstantial evidence is enough to convict and we have that.
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 I've heard plenty of people now SAY he was drunk. I haven't yet seen anyone provide evidence of that, though. Just say it. And don't tell me to prove he wasn't. You're making the accusation, burden of proof is on you. And don't tell me they delayed in reporting the incident. They delayed in reporting it to the press. Everything I've seen so far says it was reported to the proper law enforcement authorities and emergencies immediately. Maybe you should pick up the police report and give it a once-over first... 604038[/snapback] He is a DNC hack. Why start with facts now?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Oh common, you believe that crap, why wait 24 hours? Don't need one, this is not a ciminal court, this is a civil trial, circumstantial evidence is enough to convict and we have that. 604041[/snapback] They didn't wait 24 hours, they reported it immediately to the proper authorities. Who do not include the press. Why is that SO !@#$ing hard to understand?
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 No one knows, because the accident wasn't reported to the media for 24 hours. And, as we all know, the police and EMS, who were on the scene, aren't qualified to make that judgement. Just the media. Who couldn't even bother to listen for the call on a friggin' police scanner... 604039[/snapback] Even the police scanner wasn't broadcast right away. They kept a pretty good lid on it until they could achieve plausible deniability.
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Oh common, you believe that crap, why wait 24 hours? Don't need one, this is not a ciminal court, this is a civil trial, circumstantial evidence is enough to convict and we have that. 604041[/snapback] So, let's convict the guy without actually running a BAC test. Nice job. I heard you are a child molestor. The police will be showing up shortly to throw you in jail. The convistion should happen shortly after that.
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Even the police scanner wasn't broadcast right away. They kept a pretty good lid on it until they could achieve plausible deniability. 604046[/snapback] Ummm...yeah...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Even the police scanner wasn't broadcast right away. They kept a pretty good lid on it until they could achieve plausible deniability. 604046[/snapback] B.S. I thought I read that was 3 hours later, correct me if I am wrong, they had secret service there and they waited! Keep spewing you misinfo.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 Even the police scanner wasn't broadcast right away. They kept a pretty good lid on it until they could achieve plausible deniability. 604046[/snapback] How in the HELL can this possibly be anything but idle assumption on your part? Can you quote ONE fact that even motivates this?
KRC Posted February 15, 2006 Posted February 15, 2006 How in the HELL can this possibly be anything but idle assumption on your part? Can you quote ONE fact that even motivates this? 604053[/snapback] He read it on a blog?
Recommended Posts