realtruelove Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Just kidding about the second part, but am seriously amazed that some people have that kind of cash to burn. Janet Jones must be a wild one!
Beerball Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 If his net worth is say 500 times mine that's equivalent to $1,000. Not chump change, but...
Corp000085 Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Don't worry. The NHL will find that gretzky had nothing to do with it. Wayne will divorce that crook janet jones, and all will be forgotten. Nevermind the FBI evidence or the eventual criminal conviction. The Great One's number shall never be worn again by a Buffalo Sabre!
rastabillz Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Did you see last nights press conference? Gretzky denied any knowledge of the betting ring or his wifes participation in betting. He said they talked last night but not about her possible involvement. WTF, he expects us to believe in the tooth ferry? His wife drops $500K in bets and he doesn't know about it? His wife is implicated in the biggest scandel in hockey and when they talk on the phone right after the story breaks he never discuss her involvement in the scandel with her?? Yeah right Wayne. He had the look of man with liftetimes worth of credibility about to be flushed down the toilet. This is terrible, terrible news for hockey.
Frez Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 It's pretty obvious to me that she was making bets for her hubby.
rastabillz Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 It was sad to see him lying through his teeth last night. The reporters were handling him with kid gloves IMO.
BRH Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 As far as I am concerned, karma is a B word. Still think that was a "good goal," Wayne?
Dante Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 As far as I am concerned, karma is a B word. Still think that was a "good goal," Wayne? 599950[/snapback] ?
buzzbait1965 Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Personally I could give a crap if she bet $5,000,000 with a bookie. It has absolutley zero effect on my day to day life. Besides that's equivalent of me dumping $50 at a casino or on a Superbowl Pool. The government is falling all over themselves to get to the bottom of this yet they allow casinos to open about as often as a Wal-Mart store. Wal-Mart has a harder time opening a store that might actually save some people a few bucks, than a casino who is taking money from a lot of people who should be using their paychecks for family matters. I'm not against casino's mind you, but sometimes I think the issues the goverment focuses on are messed up. If they could make it legal, and get a cut from the mob or who is ever running the books, they would do it in a heartbeat. The Gretzky issue is a non story, unless he was betting on his own team and coached the game according to if he had picked his team to win or lose.
d_wag Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Did you see last nights press conference? Gretzky denied any knowledge of the betting ring or his wifes participation in betting. He said they talked last night but not about her possible involvement. WTF, he expects us to believe in the tooth ferry? His wife drops $500K in bets and he doesn't know about it? His wife is implicated in the biggest scandel in hockey and when they talk on the phone right after the story breaks he never discuss her involvement in the scandel with her?? Yeah right Wayne. He had the look of man with liftetimes worth of credibility about to be flushed down the toilet. This is terrible, terrible news for hockey. 599788[/snapback] what do you expect him to say? i did it? come on, of course he's going to plead innocence........
Ramius Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Just kidding about the second part, but am seriously amazed that some people have that kind of cash to burn. Janet Jones must be a wild one! 599770[/snapback] What, you wouldnt do wayne gretzky? And you call yourself a hockey fan?
HopsGuy Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 As far as I am concerned, karma is a B word. Still think that was a "good goal," Wayne? 599950[/snapback] That's what I was thinking. Dante - about a week after "No Goal", at the NHL awards ceremony in '99, there was still a lot of buzz about Hull's "skate in the crease". #99, before presenting an award, said something to the effect of "I thought it was a good goal."
Buckeye Eric Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Of course, all the information that we are hearing regarding the individuals and dollars involved is all based on rumor. If the dollar amounts were true, Mrs. #99 would have been responsible for 33% of the total cash flow of the ring. This sounds fictional.
BrixtonBill Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 If she had that kind of cash to lay on the Super Bowl I wonder how much she paid the refs in XL to make sure whe won? I think Mike Holmgren should hire an investigator -- this seems fishy.
HAMMER07 Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Of course, all the information that we are hearing regarding the individuals and dollars involved is all based on rumor. If the dollar amounts were true, Mrs. #99 would have been responsible for 33% of the total cash flow of the ring. This sounds fictional. 600287[/snapback] Good point. Tocchet and Gretsky are friends also, I wouldn't want to place a 75K bet on the superbowl if I knew my friend would have to pay it out.
Dante Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 That's what I was thinking. Dante - about a week after "No Goal", at the NHL awards ceremony in '99, there was still a lot of buzz about Hull's "skate in the crease". #99, before presenting an award, said something to the effect of "I thought it was a good goal." 600194[/snapback] ahhhh sorry hops. Did'nt catch that when he said it. Bullsh-- goal. Just a bad as the Super Bowl officiating.
meazza Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 i heard on the dan patrick show yesterday that there was a Mafioso Boss sitting in Eric Lindross' seats at a game. That is when suspicions were raised.
realtruelove Posted February 11, 2006 Author Posted February 11, 2006 i heard on the dan patrick show yesterday that there was a Mafioso Boss sitting in Eric Lindross' seats at a game. That is when suspicions were raised. 600338[/snapback] This sounds like a Sopranos episode.
meazza Posted February 11, 2006 Posted February 11, 2006 This sounds like a Sopranos episode. 600683[/snapback] lol the mob boss was sitting in Eric Lindros's seats at a Philly game. That is when the whole investigation starting according to Dan Patrick. Another friend of mine said that it was being run in Philadelphia.
Recommended Posts